Instrument Register
[Company], Inc., reconciled as of [date]
One row per instrument, not per holder. Built from the documents before any cap table is opened.
| ID | Holder | Instrument | Class | Shares per document | Instrument ref | Authorizing consent | Shares per consent | Authorization | Consideration received |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IN-01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IN-02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IN-03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| IN-04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Two source references, and they are different questions
| The instrument | What the holder signed. A purchase agreement, a grant notice, a warrant, a convertible |
| The authorization | What the company did. A board consent setting the number, the recipient and the consideration |
| When they disagree | The authorization decides, and the register records both numbers rather than picking one |
Filling in the second column from the first is the mistake this register exists to prevent. If no consent has been located the field stays empty and the row is flagged. It is never inferred from a signed agreement.