River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

HIPAA Security Risk Assessment Template

An asset inventory, threat ratings and a ranked fix list for your practice's HIPAA security risk assessment, plus the report, remediation plan and attestation.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 6 files: 3 documents, 3 spreadsheets

HIPAA Security Risk Assessment Template
  • Asset and Data RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Threat and Safeguard AnalysisSpreadsheet
  • Risk Assessment ReportDocument
  • Remediation TrackerSpreadsheet
  • Remediation PlanDocument
  • Management AttestationDocument
RiverHIPAA Security Risk Assessment Template

Asset and Data Register

Impact is derived from the record count

Illustrative rows for a fictional practice, Wraycombe Orthopedics. The right-hand column is computed, never picked from a dropdown.

AssetRecordsCIAImpactIn use since
Imaging archive128,4005445Mar 2014
Legacy billing exports on a NAS63,9005215Sep 2011
Electronic health record41,2005554Jun 2017
Clearinghouse portal38,7004323Feb 2019
Email and calendar9,4003232Jan 2016
Ambient scribe vendor3,8005212Apr 2025
Online intake form vendor2,6004212Sep 2024

Last analysis current as of 4 March 2024. Shaded rows came into use after it.

The record system is not the top row. An archive of old billing exports nobody has opened in years outranks it, because impact is computed from what is in the asset rather than from how important the asset feels.

Remaining columns: Category, What It Holds, Record Count Source, Where It Lives, Vendor, Access Count, Authentication, Encrypted At Rest, Encrypted In Transit, Backed Up, Restore Tested, Logs Retained, Analysis Current As Of, Owner, Notes.

Page 1 of 1198 words

How to do a HIPAA security risk assessment

A HIPAA security risk assessment is the written risk analysis that the US HIPAA Security Rule requires. It lists every place your practice creates, receives, stores or sends electronic patient information, and the threats that could expose, alter or lock up each one. It then rates how likely and how harmful each threat is, given the safeguards you can prove, and ends in a ranked plan to reduce the biggest risks.

Start from where the data lives, not from a checklist of rules. You can't rate the risk to a system nobody has listed.

A computer on a wall-mounted arm in a medical exam room, next to a blood pressure cuff, exam instruments and glove boxes
Every exam room computer that can open a chart belongs in the inventory. Photo: fr0ggy5 on Unsplash

What a HIPAA security risk assessment must cover

The requirement is one sentence: an accurate and thorough assessment1 of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the electronic patient information you hold. The next requirement, risk management, asks for security measures that bring those risks down to a reasonable and appropriate level.

The rule doesn't prescribe a method, but HHS's guidance on risk analysis2 lists what any method must cover. That means where the data is, its threats and vulnerabilities, current safeguards, likelihood, impact, a risk level for each threat and vulnerability pair, written results and regular updates.

For small and medium practices, HHS offers a Security Risk Assessment Tool3 as a Windows app or an Excel workbook. NIST, the federal standards agency, says in its HIPAA guide that a questionnaire like this cannot identify technical vulnerabilities4 and should be paired with vulnerability scanning.

List every place patient data lives

Build the inventory before you rate anything. NIST calls this the preparation step and warns that if you miss a system the data flows to, you may not be able to identify all the relevant threats4. It says the scope should take in laptops, phones, removable media, medical devices, remote staff and vendors with remote access.

  1. Read 18 months of payments

    Export recurring charges from card and bank statements. Any subscription that touches patients is a candidate.

  2. List what staff log into

    Check a single sign-on report, a password manager export or browser bookmarks. Free tools never appear on a statement.

  3. Collect the technical lists

    Get the device and network list from your IT provider, plus your records system's users and connections.

  4. Ask about forgotten places

    Old file shares, exports from a replaced system, copiers that store scans, USB drives and phones with work email.

Give each asset a row with its record count and where the count came from, such as a patient total or an export's row count. A backup holds what its source holds, so give it the same count. Add the date each asset came into use, so you can tell later whether an analysis covered it.

Pair each asset with the threats that reach it

Go asset by asset and decide which threats reach each one. NIST's guide says to consider phishing, ransomware and insider threats4. Describe each weakness in your practice's own terms: not "credential theft" but "one front desk login shared by four people, with no second factor."

Not every threat reaches every asset: an office fire threatens the server in the closet, not the portal your vendor hosts. Give each ruled-out threat a one-line reason, or it looks like one nobody considered.

Common threats in a small practice

ThreatUsually reachesMostly harms
Stolen or reused passwordsRecords system, email, billing, payer portalsConfidentiality
RansomwareServers, workstations and networked backupsAll three
Lost or stolen deviceLaptops, phones, USB drivesConfidentiality
Access beyond a person's roleRecords and billing systemsConfidentiality and integrity
Misdirected fax, email or messageEmail, fax, patient portalConfidentiality
Data loss with no working backupServers, imaging archive, records systemAvailability and integrity

Rate likelihood and impact from evidence

Any consistent scale works. A common one scores likelihood and impact from 1 to 5 and multiplies them, for a risk out of 25. Rate each pair twice, without and then with today's safeguards. HHS says to check whether safeguards are configured and used properly2, so treat one that exists only in a policy as missing.

Base impact on what the asset holds, not how important it feels. Start from the record count, then ask which of confidentiality, integrity and availability the threat hits.

ExampleThree rated pairs from a small practiceAn illustrative example written for this guide

Billing exports on an old shared drive (60,000 patients), stolen password: likelihood 4, impact 5, risk 20. No safeguard found. Residual risk 20.

Records system (40,000 patients), stolen password: likelihood 4, impact 4, risk 16. The policy requires multi-factor sign-in, but the setting is off. Residual risk 16.

Staff laptops, lost device: likelihood 3, impact 4, risk 12. Full-disk encryption, shown in a dated screenshot, keeps a lost laptop's data unreadable. Residual risk 3.

  • Records set the impact. The shared drive holds more patients than the records system, so it ranks higher.
  • A policy is not proof. Multi-factor sign-in exists only on paper, so the score stays at 16.

Rank fixes by risk removed per day of work

Risk management is the half that gets skipped. In its 2025 proposed rule, HHS reported that 94% of the covered entities it audited in 2016 and 2017 had failed to implement appropriate risk management5. Rather than working down the scores, group pairs by the control that would fix them, total the risk each removes, and divide by the days of work.

NIST's HIPAA guide recommends a cost-benefit analysis4 for proposed controls. Ranked by top score and by risk removed per day, the two lists often disagree. An old imaging server may own the worst score and take weeks to replace, while multi-factor sign-in might take 3 days and close rows on six systems. Keep both lists in the plan, with an owner, a date and the proof each fix will leave.

Encryption barely changes the odds of losing a laptop, but it changes what the loss exposes. Deleting data past its retention period lowers the impact of every threat to that asset. HIPAA requires a business associate agreement1 before a vendor handles patient data for you, but signing one doesn't make a breach there less likely. Rate each vendor on the safeguards it can show you.

Cheap fixes often include unique logins with multi-factor sign-in and an employee offboarding checklist that shuts a leaver's accounts on their last day. If you accept a risk, write down why, who decided and when you'll revisit it. Your HIPAA policies and procedures should then describe the safeguards you chose.

Write it down and keep it current

Keep the analysis in writing, with every version, for 6 years6 from when it was created or last in effect, whichever is later. Date each asset's assessment, not just the report: a system adopted after your last analysis was never in it.

The Security Rule sets no fixed schedule, and HHS says frequency varies: some organizations review annually or as needed2. HHS also names events that should prompt a fresh look, such as a security incident, new owners, turnover in key staff or new technology.

For 2026, clinicians in Medicare's MIPS program must attest that they conducted or reviewed a risk analysis that year and managed its risks, or score zero for Promoting Interoperability. In July 2026, CMS proposed dropping that measure from 20277, though the HIPAA requirement would remain.

A stricter rule is proposed, not final

In January 2025, HHS proposed requiring a written technology asset inventory and network map5 and a risk analysis reviewed at least every 12 months. As of October 2026 it is still a proposal, so follow the current rule.

Before you sign it off

  • Every place that holds patient data, vendors included, has a row and a sourced record count
  • Each asset is paired with its threats, with a reason for any ruled out
  • Every safeguard you credited has a dated setting, export or screenshot
  • Each fix has an owner, a target date and the proof it will leave
  • The analysis is dated to its oldest asset assessment, not the day you signed

When to call a lawyer

Neither this guide nor the template is legal advice. Ask a healthcare attorney before you call a gap compliant or not, answer a regulator, or decide whether an incident is a reportable breach.

If the work uncovers a breach or attack, a security incident response plan sets out who acts and which notices fall due. This assessment covers patient data, not staff safety, which falls under OSHA and has its own OSHA safety checklist for medical offices. To build this analysis from your own records, open this template in River.

How to use this template

Use the files as they are, or open them in River. River asks for records you already have, such as an 18-month payment export, a list of what staff log into, a device list and any past assessment. It builds the asset inventory first, noting where each record count came from, and rates nothing until that inventory exists.

Its first report names the system holding the most patient records, anything found in payments or logins but missing from every list, and the safeguards nobody could prove. A weekly check also flags systems adopted since your last assessment. River never declares you compliant; that judgment stays with you and your advisers.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Get all six files free, three Word documents and three CSV sheets, or open the template in River and send it your records.

  2. Inventory every system first

    List each place patient data lives, with a sourced record count. In River, send your payment export and login and device lists.

  3. Rate each asset's threats

    Pair every asset with the threats that reach it, then score likelihood and impact before and after the safeguards you can prove.

  4. Rank the fixes and sign off

    Order fixes by risk removed per day of work, assign owners and dates, then complete the report and the attestation.

What's in the template

Every document in the packThe Threat and Safeguard Analysis, the Remediation Tracker, and what the analysis no longer covers.
HIPAA Security Risk Assessment Template
RiverThreat Analysis

Threat and Safeguard Analysis

One row per asset crossed with one threat that actually reaches it. Sixty-three pairs across eleven assets, not a full cross product.

AssetThreatLIInherentSafeguard verifiedResidual
Legacy imaging serverRansomware5525none25
Legacy billing exportsCredential theft4520none20
Imaging archiveCredential theft4520none20
Electronic health recordCredential theft4416policy only16
Electronic health recordInsider access3412Role review, Feb8
Staff laptopsLost device326Disk encryption2

Policy only is rated as none. The record system's multi-factor row is supported by a sentence in a policy and by no setting anybody could produce, so it is rated as though the control is absent and the report says that is what was done. This single discipline is most of the difference between this analysis and the practice's own estimate of itself.

The same threat crosses six assets. Credential theft appears on the record system, both archives, the clearinghouse portal, email and the backup console. That pattern is closed by one control, and it is invisible in a register organized by specification.

Every pair records why the threat applies, or why it does not. A threat marked not applicable with no reasoning is indistinguishable from a threat nobody considered.

RiverRemediation Tracker

Remediation Tracker

Ranked twice, because the two orderings disagree and the disagreement is the output.

ControlPairsRisk removedDaysPer dayBy score
Unique IDs and multi-factor14102334.02nd
Delete billing exports past retention655227.53rd
Automatic logoff936218.06th
Replace legacy imaging server442251.71st

Why the migration is not first

It owns the single worst pair in the register, 25 of 25, and it is a real finding. It is also 25 days of work that closes four rows on one asset. Three days of access control closes fourteen rows across six assets and removes two and a half times the risk. Both rankings are in the tracker so the practice argues with the order rather than inheriting it.

The deletion row

Deleting billing exports past their retention need is the only control here that reduces impact rather than likelihood, because it reduces the record count itself. Second highest rate in the register, two days of work, and it is on almost no practice's list.

A business associate agreement appears in the plan and not in the risk reduction column. It allocates consequence rather than lowering likelihood, and mixing the two breaks the arithmetic.

RiverWhat It No Longer Covers

Coverage

What the analysis no longer covers

Last analysis current as of4 March 2024Assets in the register11
Assets adopted after that date3Their pairs15 of 63

The ambient scribe vendor, the online intake form vendor and the patient survey platform all came into use after the analysis was written. Twenty-four percent of the register was never assessed, and the report's cover date says nothing about it.

Why the date is per asset

A risk analysis is a statement about a set of assets, not a file with a date on it. The Security Rule makes the trigger for re-evaluation an environmental or operational change rather than an anniversary, so the register carries an assessment date on every row and the weekly sweep reads that column instead of the report.

The separate clock

A practice attesting to a payment program has a second obligation running on its own timetable, and the two are tracked apart rather than assumed to be the same thing.

The attestation takes its currency date from the oldest assessed asset, not from the day it was signed.

  • Asset and Data Register sheet20 starter rows, from the records system to copiers and paper files, with columns for record counts and safeguards.
  • Threat and Safeguard Analysis sheet12 common threats, each tied to a HIPAA section, with columns to rate them before and after safeguards.
  • Remediation Tracker sheet14 common fixes, with columns that rank each by risk removed per day and by highest single score.
  • Risk Assessment ReportA summary readable in 10 minutes, including assets the analysis missed and safeguards nobody could verify.
  • Remediation PlanHow to order fixes, assign owners and dates, accept a risk in writing and close an item.
  • Management AttestationA one-page statement for the practice's leader to sign: what was assessed, found and decided.

Common questions

What is a HIPAA security risk assessment?

It is the risk analysis the HIPAA Security Rule requires: a documented review of the risks to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the electronic patient information you hold. In practice, it inventories every system holding that data, rates each threat by likelihood and impact, and leads to a written plan for reducing the worst risks.

How often do you need to do a HIPAA risk assessment?

The Security Rule sets no fixed interval, but the analysis has to stay current. HHS says some organizations review annually or as needed, and that a security incident, new owners, key staff turnover or new technology should prompt a review. For 2026, clinicians in Medicare's MIPS program must also attest to doing or reviewing one, though CMS has proposed dropping that measure from 2027.

Is the HHS Security Risk Assessment Tool enough?

It is a sound starting point for a small practice, not the whole job. The tool is a questionnaire, so it cannot find technical weaknesses such as unpatched software, and NIST advises pairing it with vulnerability scanning. Its results also depend on your inventory, so list every system holding patient data before you start.

Can a small practice do its own risk assessment?

Yes. Nothing in the Security Rule requires an outside assessor, and HHS built its Security Risk Assessment Tool for small and medium practices. If you hire a firm, the responsibility still sits with you, and HHS's audits found outside firms often fell short5 of the rule. Get expert help for vulnerability scans, complex networks and legal questions.

How long should you keep a HIPAA risk assessment?

Keep it for 6 years from the date it was created or the date it was last in effect, whichever is later, under the Security Rule's documentation requirement. Keep superseded versions too, not just the latest: together they show which risks you knew about and what you decided at each point.

Is this HIPAA security risk assessment template free?

Yes. All six files download free with no signup: three Word documents and three CSV sheets. The sheets come with starter rows for 20 kinds of assets, 12 common threats and 14 common fixes, most with a guidance note. Edit with AI opens the files in River instead, where the work starts with your asset inventory.

What does Edit with AI do?

It sets up the six files in your own River workspace, free to start. You send records you already have, such as a payment export, login and device lists, and any past assessment. River builds the asset inventory first, notes where each count came from, and marks safeguards unverified until you show proof. It never declares you compliant.

Sources

  1. eCFR. “45 CFR 164.308 — Administrative safeguards.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. HHS. “Guidance on Risk Analysis.” hhs.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. “Security Risk Assessment Tool.” healthit.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. NIST. “Implementing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule: A Cybersecurity Resource Guide.” nvlpubs.nist.gov (opens in a new tab)

  5. Federal Register. “HIPAA Security Rule To Strengthen the Cybersecurity of Electronic Protected Health Information.” federalregister.gov (opens in a new tab)

  6. eCFR. “45 CFR 164.316 — Policies and procedures and documentation requirements.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  7. Federal Register. “Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2027 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; and Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program.” federalregister.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River