River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Performance Improvement Plan Template

The plan, a meeting guide, a check-in form and an outcome note, plus sheets that show which concerns were raised before and track review dates.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 6 files: 4 documents, 2 spreadsheets

Performance Improvement Plan Template
  • PIP DocumentDocument
  • Manager Conversation GuideDocument
  • Weekly Check-in FormatDocument
  • Outcome NoteDocument
  • Evidence LogSpreadsheet
  • Milestone TrackerSpreadsheet

How to write a performance improvement plan

A performance improvement plan (PIP) is a written plan giving an employee a fixed period, such as 30, 60 or 90 days, to reach the standard their job requires. A good one names each problem and the date it was first raised. It sets a measurable target for each, lists the support you'll give, fixes the check-in dates and says plainly what happens at the end.

The rule that matters most: nothing in the plan should be news. If you've never raised a concern with the person, raise it now and write it down, but leave it out of this plan.

A woman with a pen, notebook and laptop listens to a colleague across a desk in a small office
Every concern in the plan should trace back to a conversation you wrote down. Photo: Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Decide whether a performance improvement plan fits

A PIP is for performance problems that keep recurring after you've raised them. In an article from SHRM, the HR professional association, employment lawyer Katherine Rigby warns that a one-time failure may mean it's too soon for a PIP1. Misconduct is different: for a safety threat or serious insubordination, the same article notes, most employers act at once.

Then check what else is going on. Take extra care if the person has recently:

  • Complained about discrimination or harassment, or been a witness in a complaint
  • Asked for a change at work because of a medical condition, even without saying "accommodation"
  • Taken or asked for protected leave, such as Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave

The EEOC, which enforces federal workplace discrimination laws, says complaining does not shield an employee from all discipline or discharge2. But reprimands, unfairly low evaluations and increased scrutiny can count as retaliation if they're done because of a complaint. A record dated before the complaint helps show the plan isn't a response to it.

Health and leave need care too. In one EEOC example, a supervisor postpones a 60-day PIP to handle an accommodation request3, then starts it once the accommodation is arranged. Accommodation never requires excusing poor performance. Labor Department rules also bar treating FMLA leave as a negative factor in disciplinary actions4.

When to involve a lawyer

Talk to an employment lawyer before starting a PIP with someone in any of these situations, and before any PIP ends in dismissal or demotion. This guide is general information, not legal advice.

Check every concern against the record

List every concern you're considering, and for each one look for a dated record showing the person was told. Jennifer Long, another lawyer quoted by SHRM, recommends that a PIP confirm earlier chances to improve, with dates of prior coaching or corrective action1.

What counts as a record

EvidenceCounts?Why
Dated one-on-one noteYesShows when you raised it and what you asked for
Email to the personYesThey had it in writing, on a known date
Past review or written warningYesA formal record they received
Complaints you never passed onNoThe person was never told
A sense that they're strugglingNoNothing specific or dated to point to

Match the specific concern, not the mood of your notes. A March note about missed deadlines doesn't show you ever raised their tone in meetings.

A concern with no record may still be true; nothing shows the person was told. Leave it out, raise it at your next one-on-one meeting and write down what you said. If it continues, it can go into a later plan.

Write each concern as a standard they can meet

Give every concern that passes four parts: what happened, when you first raised it, the standard to reach and the support you'll give. When the gap is a skill, a skills matrix shows who on the team could coach it. Describe the work, not the person: "missed 9 of 40 response targets," not "careless."

Reviewing 35 years of goal-setting research, psychologists Edwin Locke and Gary Latham concluded that when people are asked to do their best, they do not do so5. With no number attached, almost any result can pass. "Must improve" is that kind of goal.

ExampleOne concern, rewritten for the planAn illustrative example written for this guide

What happened: In March, 9 of Sam's 40 priority tickets missed the 4-hour first-response target.

First raised: One-on-one on February 18, and a follow-up email on March 11.

Standard: In each review period, at least 95% of priority tickets get a first response within 4 hours.

Support: A daily 15-minute queue review with the support manager for the first three weeks.

  • The vague version. "Sam needs to be more responsive to customers and improve his attitude."
  • Attitude is gone. It had never been raised in writing, so it waits for a conversation first.

US federal agencies follow a written rule much like this. Under 5 CFR 432.1046, an agency must name where performance falls short, state the standard, give a reasonable chance to meet it and offer help. Private employers aren't bound by it, but it's a useful checklist.

Set the length and the check-in dates

Choose a length that gives the target time to show in the numbers. Rigby suggests a specific duration, such as 30 to 90 days1. A weekly measure like response times can show change within 30 days; a sales pipeline may need 90.

Fix every check-in date before the plan starts and write them into the plan. If a check-in happens late, log it as late, against its due date.

A 60-day plan, review by review

WhenWhat happensWhat you write down
Day 0The PIP meetingWho attended, and that they got a copy
Day 20First check-in on every concernMet, partially met or not met, with evidence
Day 40Second check-inThe same, plus anything still off track
Day 60Final reviewThe decision and the evidence for each concern

At each check-in, rate every concern and tell the person where they stand. Locke and Latham's review found that for goals to work, people need feedback that shows their progress toward them5.

Don't average the concerns

Three concerns met and one missed isn't "mostly on track." It's one specific problem, and the next check-in should name it.

Deliver the plan in a private meeting

Before you issue the plan

  • Every concern has a dated record showing the person was told
  • Each standard is a number, deadline or behavior someone else could check
  • The support names who helps, how often and until when
  • Every check-in date and the consequence are written into the plan
  • HR has checked for recent complaints, accommodation requests and protected leave

Long advises delivering a PIP in a private meeting, ideally late in the workday1, away from any major deadline. That way the person isn't sent back to urgent work, or past co-workers, while upset.

  1. Say what this is

    Tell them plainly that this is a formal performance improvement plan. Don't open with unrelated praise.

  2. Walk through each concern

    Give its date and source, then the standard. Pause after each one for questions.

  3. Answer the two hard questions

    "What exactly do I need to do?" Give the standard. "What happens if I don't?" Give the stated consequence.

  4. Close with dates and a copy

    Confirm the check-in dates, hand over a copy and ask for a signature that confirms receipt, not agreement.

Close the plan with a written outcome

On the final review date, write down one decision: the plan was met, it's extended, or the stated consequence takes effect. That consequence isn't always dismissal. Rigby notes that further discipline, demotion and transfer are other options1.

Back the decision with the evidence for each concern. Extend only for an observable reason, such as a concern moving from not met to partially met, never because ending the plan is hard.

Hand the person a written copy of the decision, and keep the plan, check-ins and outcome together. In the US, an EEOC rule requires covered employers to keep a dismissed employee's personnel records for one year from the date of termination7. If a discrimination charge is filed, keep them until it's resolved.

If the plan ends in dismissal, the employee termination checklist covers what comes next; if it's met, carry the evidence into the next performance review. Open this template with Edit with AI and River checks each concern against your notes before it drafts the plan.

How to use this template

Use the files on their own. Fill in the Evidence Log first, draft the PIP Document from the concerns that pass, and deliver it with the Manager Conversation Guide. Then run the plan with the Weekly Check-in Format and Milestone Tracker, and finish with the Outcome Note.

Or open the template with Edit with AI. River asks for the concerns you're considering and at least six months of the person's record, such as one-on-one notes, reviews and emails. It builds the Evidence Log first, so you see which concerns were raised before. Then it drafts the plan and meeting guide from those alone, citing a dated source for each.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Download the four Word documents and two CSV sheets free, or open the template in River and start with the Evidence Log.

  2. Check each concern first

    List every concern, then log the dated note, email or review showing it was raised. Hold out any with none.

  3. Write the plan and meet

    Draft the PIP Document from documented concerns only, with measurable standards and fixed check-in dates, then hold the meeting.

  4. Track it to an outcome

    Log each check-in against its due date, rate every concern separately, and record the decision in the Outcome Note.

What's in the template

What survives the check, and what does notThe Evidence Log runs before the PIP Document is drafted, never after. A concern held out here can still become a documented conversation today, and a real concern for the next draft.
Performance Improvement Plan Template
RiverEvidence Log

Evidence Log

Illustrative example. Marloe Logistics, fictional warehouse software company. Iris Wexford, Support Team Lead, manager Naomi Trask. Checked against 6 months of 1:1 notes and 2 prior reviews.

Concern as draftedStatusSource and dateGoes into this PIP?
Missed 3 of 5 SLA targets last quarterDocumentedWeekly ops review note, 2026-01-05Yes
Response quality flagged by 2 customersDocumented1:1 notes, 2025-11-12 and 2025-12-03Yes
Team reports feeling unsupported in escalationsFirst-mentionSkip-level note, 2025-12-18 (team's view; no record Iris was told)No, have the conversation first
Inconsistent attendance at the Tuesday stand-upFirst-mentionNo prior record foundNo, have the conversation first
Resistant to feedback in 1:1sFirst-mentionNo prior record foundNo, have the conversation first

2 of 5 drafted concerns documented (40%), 3 of 5 first-mention (60%). The plan is issued with the two documented concerns only.

RiverMilestone Tracker

Milestone Tracker

Computed from a 60-day plan length and a fixed 20-day review interval, plan start 2026-01-22.

MilestoneDue dateStatusNotes
Plan start and conversation2026-01-22CompleteDelivered with Evidence Log concerns only
Check-in 1 (day 20)2026-02-11Scheduled
Check-in 2 (day 40)2026-03-03Scheduled
Final review (day 60)2026-03-23ScheduledOutcome Note due same day

Every review date is computed from the plan length and interval rather than picked by feel, so a check-in logged late against its due date shows as late rather than blending into an informal cadence.

  • PIP DocumentThe plan itself: dated concerns, checkable standards, every check-in date, what each outcome means and signature lines.
  • Manager Conversation GuideHow to run the PIP meeting, from opening it plainly to answering what happens if the plan isn't met.
  • Weekly Check-in FormatA form for every check-in: each concern marked met, partially met or not met, with evidence.
  • Outcome NoteThe final decision, the evidence behind it for each concern, and where the records are filed.
  • Evidence Log sheetEach drafted concern, marked documented or first-mention, with its source, date and whether it goes in.
  • Milestone Tracker sheetEvery milestone from the PIP meeting to the final review, with due date, status and notes.

Common questions

What should a performance improvement plan include?

A PIP should list each concern with the date and source showing it was raised before, plus a measurable standard for each. Add the support you'll give, the plan's length, every check-in date and what happens if the plan is met or not. Finish with a signature line that confirms receipt, not agreement.

How long should a PIP last?

Pick a fixed length, such as 30, 60 or 90 days, long enough for the target to show up in your numbers. A measure tracked weekly can move within a month, while a sales pipeline may need a full quarter. Set every check-in date at the start, for example days 20, 40 and 60 of a 60-day plan.

Can you put someone on a PIP without warning them first?

You shouldn't. A PIP should follow earlier conversations about the same problems, written down with dates. If a concern has never been raised, raise it in a one-on-one, document it and give the person a fair chance to improve. Keeping only concerns with a dated record in the plan makes it fairer and easier to defend.

Does a PIP always end in termination?

No. A PIP should give a real chance to improve, and a plan that's met simply closes. If it isn't met, dismissal is one possible outcome; further discipline, demotion or transfer are others. If you've already decided to dismiss someone, a PIP is the wrong tool, so talk to HR or an employment lawyer instead.

Should the employee sign the PIP?

Ask them to, but make clear the signature confirms they received the plan, not that they agree with it. Give them time to read it first rather than insisting on a signature in the meeting. If they decline, note the date you handed them a copy and keep that note with the plan.

Is this performance improvement plan template free?

Yes. Download the four Word documents and two CSV sheets with no signup. Both sheets come filled in with a made-up example (five drafted concerns and a 60-day schedule), so you can see how they work before clearing them. Edit with AI opens the same template in a free River workspace.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace, starting with the Evidence Log. Send River your draft concerns and at least six months of notes, reviews and emails, and it flags any concern with no dated earlier record. Once each one is held out or supported by a record, it drafts the plan, then logs each check-in you send against its due date.

Sources

  1. SHRM. “PIPs: Write, Implement and Time Them Precisely.” shrm.org (opens in a new tab)

  2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Retaliation.” eeoc.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Applying Performance and Conduct Standards to Employees with Disabilities.” eeoc.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. eCFR. “29 CFR 825.220 — Protection for employees who request leave or otherwise assert FMLA rights.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  5. American Psychologist. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey.” doi.org (opens in a new tab)

  6. eCFR. “5 CFR 432.104 — Addressing unacceptable performance.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  7. eCFR. “29 CFR 1602.14 — Preservation of records made or kept.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River