River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Grant Budget Template for Nonprofits

A grant budget in your funder's categories and your own accounts, with indirect costs, match and a narrative that all agree to the dollar.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 6 files: 3 documents, 3 spreadsheets

Grant Budget Template for Nonprofits
  • Budget NarrativeDocument
  • Indirect Cost ExplanationDocument
  • Match and In-kind NoteDocument
  • Budget in the Funder's CategoriesSpreadsheet
  • Crosswalk to Chart of AccountsSpreadsheet
  • Match Documentation RegisterSpreadsheet
RiverGrant Budget Template for Nonprofits

Crosswalk to Chart of Accounts

One row per account and destination pair

Built at proposal time, not at report time. Every row foots back to its account. Every destination foots up to its funder category.

AccountDestinationAmountShapeAllocation basis
Salaries and wagesPersonnel-one to onenot needed
Payroll taxesFringe Benefits-many to onenot needed
Employee benefitsFringe Benefits-many to onenot needed
OccupancyOther-SPLITsquare footage
OccupancyIndirect pool-SPLITsquare footage
Professional feesContractual-SPLITengagement letter
Professional feesIndirect pool-SPLITengagement letter
Sum of account totals-
Sum of destinations-must be the same figure

Why the second direction is the point

A crosswalk that only foots forward hides the accounts that split, and the accounts that split are the entire reason to build one. Each of them needs a measurable basis, stated now, that every future report re-applies.

The two bases, kept apart

Total direct costs is what a funder cap is written against. Modified total direct costs is what a negotiated rate is written against. Build both from the accounts before any rate touches them.

Page 1 of 1186 words

How to create a grant budget

A grant budget is the itemized list of costs you ask a funder to pay, set out in the funder's categories with the math behind every line. A good one prices each line from a real source, such as a salary schedule, a quote or a lease. It charges indirect costs on the right base, shows any required match, and ties every figure to an account in your books.

Build it for whoever will report against it. A budget is written once but reported against for the life of the grant, often by someone else. So every number should lead back to a document and an account.

A person's hands entering figures on a blue calculator beside a computer keyboard and a yellow mug
Price each line from a document you could show a reviewer. Photo: Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Start from the funder's form

Take the categories, their names and their order from the funder's form, not from a standard list. For many US federal grants that is the SF-424A, whose instructions set out eight cost categories, Personnel through Other, followed by indirect charges1. Foundations often want fewer lines, or a format of their own.

Before you price anything, read the instructions and the funding notice for these answers:

  • The budget period, and whether the funder wants a column for each year
  • Whether indirect costs are capped, and what the cap is a percentage of
  • Whether you must match, at what rate, and of what: the funder's share or the total project cost
  • Costs the notice rules out, even where general rules would allow them
  • Where consultants, stipends and rent belong on the form

If the instructions leave one open, ask the program officer in writing and note the reading you took.

Price each line from a source

Every figure should come from something you could hand a reviewer: a salary schedule, a quote, the lease, a recent invoice. Personnel is each salary times the share of time that person will really spend on the project. Avoid last year's total plus a percentage, and round numbers that look picked to fill a ceiling.

Then put each cost where the form expects it. The SF-424A instructions1 keep consultants, contractors and subrecipients out of Personnel. They list individual consultants under Other, and put subawards and evaluation contracts under Contractual.

Federal rules define equipment as an item that lasts more than a year and costs at least $10,000 a unit, or your capitalization threshold if that is lower2. Below that line, even a laptop that will last five years is a supply.

Put indirect costs on the right base

Indirect costs, such as accounting, personnel administration and executive salaries, serve many projects at once. In the US, federal agencies generally must accept your negotiated indirect cost rate3. Without one, you may charge a de minimis rate of up to 15% of modified total direct costs3. Once you elect it, it applies to all your federal awards until you negotiate a rate.

Rates only compare on the same base. Modified total direct costs2 leave out equipment, rent, participant support costs and the part of each subaward above $50,000, among other items. A cap written as a share of total direct costs sits on a bigger base, so turn both into dollars before you compare them.

ExampleComparing a cap with a negotiated rateAn illustrative example written for this guide. The program and its numbers are made up.

Total direct costs: $500,000, including $40,000 of equipment, $60,000 of participant stipends, $36,000 of program rent and one $80,000 subaward.

Modified total direct costs: $500,000 less those three items and the $30,000 of the subaward above $50,000, or $334,000.

Funder's cap, 10% of total direct costs: $50,000. Negotiated rate, 22% of modified total direct costs: $73,480.

  • The real gap. On the same base the cap is 15.0%, so the gap is about 7 points, not the 12 the headline rates suggest.
  • In dollars. The cap leaves $23,480 unrecovered, which on a federal award can count toward the match with prior approval.

Caps often fall short of what a grant really costs to run. Ann Goggins Gregory and Don Howard of the Bridgespan Group describe one case in the Stanford Social Innovation Review (2009). When a nonprofit added up its staff's reporting hours on a government grant, it found it was spending about 31% of the grant's value on administration4. The funder allowed only 13% for indirect costs.

Foundations set their own rules. The MacArthur Foundation, for one, adds 29% of project costs to its project grants to cover indirect costs5. Read each funder's policy instead of assuming a number.

Check the numbers in older templates

Federal rules that took effect on October 1, 2024 raised the de minimis rate from 10% to 15% and the equipment threshold from $5,000 to $10,0006. They also raised the amount of each subaward that counts in modified total direct costs from $25,000 to $50,000. Older templates, and even the Grants.gov SF-424A instructions, still show some old figures. Follow the current rule.

Value the match by the rules

Read what the match percentage applies to before you multiply. A 25% match of the federal share on a $400,000 request is $100,000. A 25% match of total project cost on the same request is $133,333, a third more, because the match is part of the total.

Then test each contribution. Under the federal cost sharing rule7, it must be verifiable in your records and not counted toward any other federal award, among other conditions. Money a state passes through from a federal program counts as a federal award2. So match already pledged to that kind of state grant can't count again on yours.

Value each kind by its own rule. Price volunteer time at rates consistent with what you pay for similar work, and donated space at no more than the fair rental value of comparable space.

One source of match is easy to miss: unrecovered indirect cost, the gap between what a cap allows and what your approved rate would charge. With prior approval, it can count toward the match7. Ask for it in the application, so it sits in the approved budget.

Map the grant budget to your accounts

Your books don't use the funder's categories. Fringe may sit in two accounts, and one phone bill may serve the project and the whole office. Before you submit, map every budget line to the account that will carry it, one row for each account and category pair.

Part of a crosswalk for a made-up program

Your accountAccount totalWhere it goesBasis for the split
5100 Program salaries$210,000Personnel $210,000Whole account
5110 Finance salaries$70,000Personnel $14,000; indirect $56,000Timesheets: 20% on this award
5200 Professional fees$40,000Contractual $30,000; indirect $10,000Evaluator and audit engagement letters
5700 Phone and internet$9,000Other $6,000; indirect $3,000Staff time: 4 of 6 FTEs

Check the totals both ways: each funder category against the accounts that feed it, and each account against everything it feeds. Every split needs a measurable basis and the document it comes from. The MacArthur Foundation's policy suggests splitting most shared costs by staff time, and rent by the space each program uses5.

Each financial report reapplies those bases, so writing them down now turns the grant report into a lookup instead of a reconstruction.

Write the justification last

Write the budget justification once the numbers settle, in the form's order. Give each line its calculation, its source and what it pays for, naming the same activities as your grant proposal. The budget narrative tool drafts one from your finished budget lines.

Who should check it

Before you submit, have your finance lead or outside accountant confirm the fringe rate, the indirect rate and every match commitment.

Before you submit

  • Every line shows its calculation and the document behind it
  • Categories, names and order match the funder's form
  • Funder categories and your accounts add up to the same total
  • Indirect costs use a rate and base the funder accepts
  • The match uses the right base, and none of it counts toward another federal award
  • The justification describes the same activities as the proposal

To start faster, open the template on this page with Edit with AI. Give River your funder's form and chart of accounts, and it works through each step above, showing the arithmetic for every figure.

How to use this template

Use the files as they are, or open them in River. Every document and sheet comes worked through for a made-up youth mentoring program, so you can follow each calculation before you replace it with your own.

With Edit with AI, River asks for your funder's budget form and notice, your chart of accounts, your cost detail and any indirect rate agreement. It builds the budget in the funder's categories and in your accounts, then shows its arithmetic for indirect costs and the match.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Download the three Word documents and three CSV sheets free, or open the whole template in River.

  2. Send the form and your accounts

    Share the funder's budget form and notice, your chart of accounts, salary and cost detail, and any rate agreement.

  3. Build the budget both ways

    River works out each line in the funder's categories from your documents, maps it to your accounts and checks both totals agree.

  4. Check indirect, match and narrative

    Review indirect costs on each base, the checked match and the narrative, then edit, share or ask for changes.

What's in the template

The crosswalk, the two bases, and the match nobody de-duplicatesOne budget in two languages, then the arithmetic the two languages make possible.
Grant Budget Template for Nonprofits
RiverCrosswalk

Crosswalk to Chart of Accounts

Illustrative, for a fictional organisation called Halyard Youth Collective. A 12-month federal application, 80 participants. Thirteen accounts carry the budget.

AccountAccount totalDestinationAmountAllocation basis
5100 Salaries and wages$318,000Personnel$318,000one to one
5150 Payroll taxes$26,300Fringe Benefits$26,300one of two accounts
5160 Employee benefits$54,100Fringe Benefits$54,100two of two accounts
5200 Professional fees$61,500Contractual$47,000evaluator engagement letter
5200 Professional fees$61,500Indirect pool$14,500audit engagement letter
5250 Subawards to partners$85,000Contractual$85,000two executed agreements
5300 Occupancy$72,000Other$43,9202,440 of 4,000 sq ft
5300 Occupancy$72,000Indirect pool$28,0801,560 of 4,000 sq ft
5600 Technology and software$28,500Supplies$19,00040 of 60 licence seats
5600 Technology and software$28,500Indirect pool$9,50020 of 60 licence seats
Six further accounts, each one to one: supplies, participant assistance, travel, insurance, equipment, training
Sum of account totals$831,600Sum of destinations$831,600foots both ways
Of which direct charges$779,520Of which indirect pool$52,080not a budget line

Three of the thirteen accounts split, and $162,000 flows through those three, which is 19.5% of the budget. Those three are the entire exercise. Each one needs a basis that is a measurable thing rather than a percentage somebody chose, and every financial report on this award for the next several years re-applies it. Note the shape of the Fringe Benefits row too: the funder has one line and Halyard has two accounts, so the report has to know to add them. None of that is hard. It is just invisible unless somebody writes it down at proposal time.

RiverIndirect

The two bases, and the three figures

The cap and the rate are not comparable percentages. Build both bases from the accounts, apply each rate to its own base, and only then convert one so they can be read together.

BaseWhat it excludesAmountShare of direct
Total direct costsnothing$779,520100.0%
Modified total direct costsfour categories, itemised below$611,40078.4%
EquipmentEquipment line on the form$20,200
Participant support costsOther line on the form$96,000
Rental costsOther line on the form$43,920
Each subaward above the first $50,000Contractual line on the form$8,000
Difference between the bases$168,12021.6%

Three rates, three results

RateBase it applies toBase amountResult
Funder cap, 10.0%Total direct costs$779,520$77,952
Negotiated, 24.6%Modified total direct costs$611,400$150,404
De minimis, 15.0%Modified total direct costs$611,400$91,710, unavailable

The cap and the rate, finally on one base

As the headline readsOn one base
Negotiated rate24.6%24.6%
Funder cap10.0%12.7%
Gap14.6 points11.9 points
Unrecovered indirect cost$72,452

Two traps live in this table. The de minimis rate is electable only by a recipient without a current negotiated rate, so Halyard cannot take it, and the figure is computed only because somebody always asks. And the subaward exclusion is per subaward: Halyard's $85,000 goes to two partners at $58,000 and $27,000, so $8,000 comes out. The same $85,000 to one partner would exclude $35,000, drop the modified base to $584,400 and cut recovery to $143,762. Two partners rather than one is worth $6,642, which is not a reason to choose partners but is a reason to compute the base after the subawards are settled.

RiverMatch

Match Documentation Register

The notice requires 25% of the federal share. 25% of $857,472 is $214,368. Read the base in that sentence: 25% of total project cost would be $285,824 from the same percentage.

ItemComputationGrossExcludedCounts
Donated clinical supervision240 hrs x $84.50 x 1.27 fringe x 1.312 indirect$33,791-$33,791
Volunteer mentor hours1,860 hrs x $22.40$41,664$13,888$27,776
Donated programme space2,400 sq ft x $18.75$45,000$45,000$0
Donated laptops14 x $340 fair market value$4,760-$4,760
Cash, family foundationcommitted in writing$62,000-$62,000
Totalgross, excluded, net$187,215$58,888$128,327

Why two items came out

620 of the 1,860 volunteer hours are already claimed against another federal award, so the hours get split rather than the item dropped. The donated space is committed in full against a state grant that is itself federal pass-through money, and money does not stop being a federal award because a state agency's name is on the agreement. Look through the pass-through, not at the name on the cheque.

Closing the gap with the indirect the cap refuses to pay

StepAmountNote
Match required$214,36825% of the federal share
Net verified after de-duplication$128,32731.5% of the file came out
Shortfall$86,041
Unrecovered indirect cost$72,452may count as cost share with prior approval
Still to raise$13,58984.2% of the gap closed

This is the move the whole pack exists to make possible, and it is only available at proposal stage. Unrecovered indirect cost may be counted as cost sharing with prior approval, and prior approval means it has to be in the approved budget. So the largest single source available for a match gap costs nothing to raise, because it is money the organisation is already spending and cannot bill, and it disappears entirely the moment the budget is submitted without it. A de-duplication check run at proposal time removes 31.5% of a development file. The same check run by an auditor removes it too, and calls it a finding.

  • Budget NarrativeA justification for every line in the form's order, with its calculation, source and any judgment call.
  • Indirect Cost ExplanationBoth bases with each exclusion listed, the cap and rates in dollars, and the unrecovered amount.
  • Match and In-kind NoteWhat the match requirement works out to, each contribution's valuation rule, and what de-duplication removed.
  • Budget in the Funder's Categories sheetEvery line in the funder's categories and order, how each figure was worked out, and checks that totals agree.
  • Crosswalk to Chart of Accounts sheetEach account mapped to the funder categories it feeds, with the basis and source for every split.
  • Match Documentation Register sheetEach match item with its computation, valuation rule, source document and any amount excluded.

Common questions

What should a grant budget include?

Every cost of the project, in the funder's categories, with the calculation behind each line. The federal SF-424A form uses personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies, contractual, construction and other, then indirect costs. Add the match if the funder requires one, and a justification that explains each line in words.

What is the difference between direct and indirect costs?

Direct costs belong to one project, such as a program coordinator's salary or workshop supplies. Indirect costs are shared by the whole organization, such as accounting, HR and the executive director's time, and are recovered through a rate. On US federal grants, that is your negotiated rate or the de minimis rate, unless the program sets a cap.

What is the de minimis indirect cost rate?

It is the rate an organization without a negotiated federal rate may charge instead: up to 15% of modified total direct costs, under rules in effect since October 1, 2024. It needs no documentation to justify it. Once you elect it, though, you must use it on every federal award until you negotiate a rate.

How do I calculate a grant match?

Multiply the match rate by the base the notice names. A 25% match of the federal share on a $200,000 request is $50,000. If the 25% applies to total project cost instead, the match works out to a third of the federal request, $66,667, because the match is part of the total.

Can volunteer time count as a match?

Yes, on US federal grants, if the service is necessary for the program. Value the hours at what your organization pays for similar work. If no one on staff does that work, use the going rate in the labor market where you would hire for it. Keep time records, and don't count the same hours toward another federal award.

Is this grant budget template free?

Yes. Download the three Word documents and three CSV sheets with no signup. The example figures, for a made-up youth mentoring program, add up across every file, so you can check the method before using your own numbers. Edit with AI opens the same template in a free River workspace.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace. River asks for your funder's form and notice, chart of accounts, cost detail and any rate agreement. It builds the budget in the funder's categories and your accounts, works out indirect costs and the match with the arithmetic shown, and writes the narrative last. It won't decide whether a cost is allowable.

Sources

  1. Grants.gov. “Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs (SF-424A) Form Instructions.” apply07.grants.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. eCFR. “2 CFR 200.1 — Definitions.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. eCFR. “2 CFR 200.414 — Indirect costs.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. Stanford Social Innovation Review. “The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle.” ssir.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. MacArthur Foundation. “Indirect Cost Policy.” macfound.org (opens in a new tab)

  6. Federal Register. “Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance.” federalregister.gov (opens in a new tab)

  7. eCFR. “2 CFR 200.306 — Cost sharing.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River