Conversion Timing Curve · by acquisition source
Two peaks, seventeen days apart
| Day band | Popup 7,320 | Guide 3,480 | Blended 12,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 1 | 3.361% | 0.805% | 2.400% |
| 2 to 3 | 1.301% | 0.637% | 1.033% |
| 4 to 6 | 1.017% | 0.525% | 0.828% |
| 7 to 10 | 0.868% | 0.410% | 0.687% |
| 11 to 14 | 0.701% | 0.471% | 0.596% |
| 15 to 21 | 0.647% | 5.588% | 2.150% |
| 22 to 34 | 0.636% | 2.881% | 1.288% |
The sequence sends on days 0, 1, 2, 4 and 6. Shaded rows are the days it says nothing.
What the blended column cannot say
Blended, day 15 to 21 reads 2.150% against 2.400% on day 0 to 1, so the second peak looks like a bump on one decaying curve. It is a second population. 5.588% is the guide cohort's peak, it belongs to 29.0% of the list, and the sequence has been silent for nine days by the time it arrives.
Hazard, and why it is not a conversion rate
First orders in the band, divided by the subscribers who still have no first order at the band's start. The denominator shrinks as people convert, so the number can rise. A cumulative conversion curve only rises, which is why it can never show a dead zone.
What the quiet cohort is worth
The guide cohort converts at 12.90% over 90 days against the popup cohort's 9.34%, and at $78 rather than the $66 the day-4 discount pair sells at. It is the better half of the intake, and not one message is timed for it.
Every hazard from day 7 onward was measured with nothing in market, so 5.588% is an unassisted rate.