Writing & MediaFree tool
Passive Voice Checker That Explains Each Fix
A comment on each passive in your draft: why it can stay, or an active rewrite that says who did what.
Free to start · Opens in your River workspace, ready to edit and share
How to check your writing for passive voice
In the passive voice, the thing acted on becomes the subject, and the actor moves into a "by" phrase or drops out. "The bid was rejected by the committee" is passive; so is "The bid was rejected." To check your writing for passive voice, find each passive, ask who did the action, then decide. Keep it when the actor is unknown or beside the point. Rewrite it, actor first, when it hides who is responsible or leaves the reader guessing.
That decision is most of the job. The UNC Writing Center is clear that the passive voice is not a grammatical error1 but a question of clarity. So don't ask "Is this passive?" Ask "Does my reader need to know who did this?"
Spot the passive voice
Do this pass late, once the content is settled. UNC's handout notes that clarity often comes when you revise1, not on your first try. On a novel, run the bigger checks first, such as stakes and continuity, with a self-editing checklist.
Most passives pair a form of "be" with a past participle. The US government's plain language guidance lists forms such as "are," "was," "were," "could be" and "have been"2, followed by a participle that usually ends in -ed. Irregular ones count too: "was written," "were paid."
For a quick test, add "by zombies" after the verb. "The budget was approved by zombies" still makes sense, so it's passive. "The office was quiet by zombies" doesn't, so it isn't.
Checkers that look only for "be" miss some passives. In a 2014 journal paper, the linguist Geoffrey Pullum shows that passives do not always contain "be"3. "Got fined" is passive, and so is a participle after a noun, as in "the plan, approved in May." UNC adds that grammar checkers typically catch only a fraction1 of passives.
Passive or not?
| Pattern | Example | Passive? |
|---|---|---|
| Be + past participle | "The budget was approved by the board." | Yes. The actor follows "by." |
| Actor left out | "The budget was approved." | Yes. Ask who approved it. |
| Get + past participle | "Two drivers got fined." | Yes, an informal passive. |
| Participle after a noun | "The plan, approved in May, stands." | Yes, with no "be" at all. |
| Be + adjective | "The office was quiet." | No. It describes a state. |
| Be + -ing verb | "The team was meeting." | No. It's active, in progress. |
| Happen, occur | "Mistakes happened." | No, though the actor is missing. |
| A command | "Send the file by Friday." | No. The actor is "you." |
Some sentences go both ways. "The door was locked" can report an action or describe a state, so read the sentence around it.
Decide which passives to keep
Keep a passive when naming the actor adds nothing for the reader. Google's developer documentation style guide allows the passive to emphasize an object, to play down an actor, or when readers don't need to know who's responsible4. Typical cases:
- The actor is unknown: "The office was broken into overnight."
- The actor doesn't matter: "The bridge was built in 1932."
- You'd rather not blame the reader: Google's guide prefers "Over 50 conflicts were found in the file" to "You created over 50 conflicts in the file."
- The law is the only actor: the federal guidance allows a passive when one action follows another as a matter of law2.
A passive also keeps your topic up front. Pullum describes a rule most writing guides miss: in a passive with "by," the actor should be at least as new to the discussion as the subject3. "Have you heard the news about YouTube? It was bought by Google" works because YouTube is already the topic.
Change it when the reader needs the actor: instructions, deadlines, decisions and findings. The federal advice puts it simply: active voice makes it clear who should do what2. "The form must be submitted by May 1" doesn't say who submits it. "You must submit the form by May 1" does.
Rewrite with the actor first
Find the actor
Look in the "by" phrase, then the sentences around it. If the draft never says, ask someone who knows.
Make the actor the subject
Put them before the verb: "The board approved the budget." If your team did it, say "we."
Let the verb do the work
If the action is hiding in a noun, bring it out: "A review was conducted" becomes "We reviewed it."
Read it in context
Check that it still follows from the sentence before and means exactly what the old one did.
Before: "The launch date was moved after testing. It was decided that the vendor contract would be reviewed, and customers will be notified by Friday. The pricing page, approved in May, is unchanged."
After: "We moved the launch date after testing. [WHO?] decided that [WHO?] would review the vendor contract, and Dana's team will notify customers by Friday. The pricing page, approved in May, is unchanged."
- An honest "we". The writer's team moved the date, so "we" is shorter and true.
- Two missing actors. "It was decided" hid who decided and who reviews. The writer didn't know, so the rewrite marks both gaps.
- A task with an owner. The writer asked: Dana's team sends the notice. "By Friday" is a deadline, not an actor.
- One passive kept. "Approved in May" is passive without "was." It stays: the page is the topic, and the approver doesn't matter.
Never guess the actor
A wrong name is worse than a passive. If the draft doesn't say who acted, write [WHO?] in its place and ask before you send it.
If a sentence still feels heavy without the passive, look for padding or a repeated word. A line editor tightens a whole page in your voice, and a repetitive word finder catches echoes.
Catch the sentences that dodge blame
The passive's worst use is hiding who is responsible. The UNC handout files "Mistakes were made" among what George Orwell called the "swindles and perversions" of writing1. Read every apology, incident report and audit finding for it.
Grammar alone won't catch it, though. Pullum notes that "mistakes happened" and "an error has occurred" are not passive3 at all. They still leave out who did it. "An error occurred during the update" dodges; "We deleted 40 customer records" doesn't. So look for the missing person, not just the missing "by."
Follow your field's conventions
Science is the big exception, and it is shifting. UNC notes that some instructors want lab reports in the passive, especially in Materials and Methods1, while more and more journals accept or prefer "we." Nature Portfolio tells authors that the active voice ("we performed the experiment...") typically helps readers5 understand results. Follow your journal's or instructor's rule.
In fiction, a passive can be the sharper choice. Pullum points to the first line of Lee Child's first Jack Reacher novel, Killing Floor: "I was arrested in Eno's diner." Reacher has no idea who ordered the arrest, so naming the actor would spoil the scene.
And don't aim for zero. George Orwell wrote "Never use the passive where you can use the active" in his 1946 essay "Politics and the English Language." Pullum counted 26% of the transitive verbs in that essay in the passive3, against about 17% in typical prose. Whatever rule your team settles on, write it into your house style guide.
Before you send it
- Every passive found, including "got" passives and participles after nouns
- You know who did each action, or you've asked
- Each passive you kept has a reason: unknown actor, beside the point, or topic first
- Every instruction, deadline and decision names who owns it
- No apology or incident report that leaves out who acted
- Your journal's, instructor's or house style rule followed
Checking a long report by hand takes a while. The tool at the top of this page comments on each passive with a verdict and, where it helps, an active rewrite. When your draft doesn't say who acted, it asks.
How it works
Paste your draft or attach the file, and choose whether River flags every passive or only the ones that hide who did what. River reads each sentence for meaning, so it catches passives without "was" and skips look-alikes. Each passive gets a comment in your document: keep it, and why, or change it, with an active rewrite. When your draft doesn't say who acted, the comment asks you. Your text stays as written until you ask for changes.
Paste your draft
Paste the text or attach the file, then choose: every passive, or only those that hide who acted.
River reads each sentence
It finds every passive, including ones without "was," and skips look-alikes such as "the door was open."
Get your comments
Each passive gets a verdict in a comment: fine as it is, or an active rewrite naming the actor.
Apply what you accept
Ask River to apply the rewrites you want, explain a comment, or check the draft for repeated words.
What you get
- A comment on each passive, anchored to the exact sentence where it appears in your draft
- A plain verdict on each one, with the reason: fine as it is, or worth changing
- An active rewrite for each one worth changing, naming the actor and keeping your meaning and tone
- A question such as "Who approved this?" wherever your draft doesn't say who acted, never a guess
- Passives without "was" caught, like "got fired," and look-alikes like "the door was open" left alone
- A short summary in chat: how many passives, how many to change, and which patterns repeat
Common questions
What is passive voice?
Passive voice turns a sentence around so that what was acted on comes first and the doer comes later, after "by," or not at all. "The client signed the contract" is active. "The contract was signed by the client" is passive, and so is "The contract was signed," which drops the client entirely.
Is passive voice grammatically wrong?
No. Passive voice is correct grammar, and sometimes it's the better choice, such as when nobody knows who acted or when the thing acted on is your topic. The trouble comes from passives that leave out who is responsible for a decision, a task or a mistake. Those are the ones worth rewriting with the actor first.
How do you change passive voice to active voice?
Find who did the action, make them the subject, and put the verb in its active form. "The invoice was paid by the client" becomes "The client paid the invoice." If the sentence doesn't say who acted, find out before you rewrite it, because an invented actor changes the facts.
How do I check my writing for passive voice with River?
Paste your draft into the box at the top of this page, or attach the file, and choose whether to flag every passive or only those that hide who acted. River leaves a comment on each one saying whether to keep it, with an active rewrite where it's worth changing. It all opens in your free River workspace.
Will River change my draft?
Not unless you ask. River leaves comments on the passives and keeps your text exactly as you wrote it. When you're ready, ask River in chat to apply the rewrites you accept, and it changes only those sentences. If your draft doesn't say who acted, the rewrite shows [WHO?] and the comment asks you, rather than inventing a name.
Should research papers avoid passive voice?
Not entirely. Some instructors still require the passive for lab procedures, while a growing number of journals accept or prefer "we." Check your target journal's author instructions first. A sound rule: use the passive where the procedure matters more than who ran it, and the active where you claim, argue or interpret.
Is the passive voice checker free?
Yes, it is free to start. Your commented draft opens in a River workspace, where you can edit it, share it or ask River to change it. Paid plans add more AI use and access to the most advanced models.
Sources
UNC Writing Center. “Passive Voice.” writingcenter.unc.edu (opens in a new tab)
Digital.gov. “Writing for understanding.” digital.gov (opens in a new tab)
Geoffrey K. Pullum, University of Edinburgh. “Fear and Loathing of the English Passive.” pullum.ppls.ed.ac.uk (opens in a new tab)
Google developer documentation style guide. “Active voice.” developers.google.com (opens in a new tab)
Nature Portfolio. “How to write your paper.” nature.com (opens in a new tab)
Built by
Chandler Supple
Co-founder & CEO, River
Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.