River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Interview Process and Scorecard Template

Five documents and three sheets for one role's interviews: a weight and one interviewer per skill, the scorecard, the debrief and the offer recommendation.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 8 files: 5 documents, 3 spreadsheets

Interview Process and Scorecard Template
  • How a Competency Earns a SlotDocument
  • Interview Guides by StageDocument
  • Panel BriefDocument
  • Debrief FormatDocument
  • Offer RecommendationDocument
  • Competency to Interviewer AssignmentSpreadsheet
  • ScorecardSpreadsheet
  • Loop Feedback LogSpreadsheet
RiverInterview Process and Scorecard Template

Competency to Interviewer Assignment, one row

One competency, one weight, one name, and the minutes it is allowed

Weights fixed and dated before the first candidate is booked. Nothing on this row is edited after the panel meets.

From Register Row

The numbered requirement it came from. A competency with no row behind it does not enter the loop, and a competency that belongs in the loop but is not on the register sends you upstream to fix the register first.

Weight

A number, and all the weights sum to 100. This is the column that turns a list of competencies into a decision rule, and it is the one every blank scorecard leaves out.

Owner

One interviewer, by name. They prepare the test, run it, and write the rating with its evidence. A second name is a second read: allowed once, on the heaviest competency, written on the row with its reason and taken blind.

How It Is Tested

The specific thing that settles it. A work sample with a seeded fault. A ten-minute live walkthrough with four planted questions. A graded 200-word status note. Whatever it is, somebody has to build it before the loop opens, and that somebody is the owner.

Minutes

Divided by weight, this is the check that catches a five-point competency booked for a full hour.

Reads And Minutes In The Audited Loop

The two columns that make the redesign land. What the loop you run today already spends on this competency, from the interviewers' own guides, sitting next to what it is worth.

Page 1 of 1260 words

How to design an interview process and scorecard

An interview process is the planned set of interviews and tests every candidate for a role goes through. The interview scorecard is where each interviewer records a rating and the evidence behind it. A good process tests about six skills, rarely more than eight, taken from the job's requirements. Each skill gets a weight and a single interviewer, every candidate hears the same questions, and every scorecard is in before the panel meets to decide.

Timing matters most. Settle what you'll test, what each skill is worth and who tests it before you meet the first candidate. Decided later, those choices tend to bend toward whoever the panel already likes.

A woman in a gray suit holds a clipboard and pen as she interviews a man seated across the table
Rate each answer while it's fresh, against levels written in advance. Photo: Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Start from what the job needs

List what the new hire must be able to do. Start from the job description's must-haves or, better, a requirement register that says how each one would be checked. The US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) notes that interview questions built on competencies a job analysis identifies as critical to success1 show high validity and strong agreement between raters.

Next, sort every requirement into one of three groups.

  • Test it in the interviews: skills you can only judge by watching or asking, such as training a room of new staff.
  • Confirm it from a document: facts such as a license, a degree or a stated willingness to travel. Check these once at screening and give them no interview time.
  • Rewrite it or drop it: anything nobody can describe in observable terms. "Culture fit" can't be rated until you name the behavior you mean.

Weight each skill before you meet anyone

Give each skill a weight so the weights add up to 100. Base each one on how much of the job the skill covers and what a weak hire on it would cost. The must-haves together should outweigh the nice-to-haves. Then date the sheet.

Weights matter because people gather evidence well and combine it badly. Writing in Harvard Business Review, researchers Nathan Kuncel, Deniz Ones and David Klieger call people very bad at weighing the results2 of a hiring process. In the 17 studies they analyzed, a simple equation beat human judgment by at least 25%.

Set before the first interview, the weights give your panel a simple equation of its own. Leave them alone once anyone has been rated: a weight changed after the panel has a favorite is a justification, not a weight.

Choose a test for each skill

Structured questions, the same for every candidate, test most skills. Ask about the past ("Tell me about a project you ran that slipped") or pose a situation from the job ("A customer's launch will be two weeks late. What do you tell them?"). A behavioral interview question bank gives you questions and rating anchors grouped by skill.

When a skill is needed from day one, use a work sample, such as reconciling two real files with one planted error. OPM describes work samples as tasks that mirror what employees do on the job3. It also warns they can be costly to develop and may not fit skills you plan to teach after hiring.

Both methods earn their place. Writing for SIOP, the professional society for workplace psychologists, two researchers summarize a 2022 reanalysis of hiring research by Paul Sackett and colleagues. The reanalysis found that structured interviews predicted job performance best, with work sample tests also in the top five4.

Give every skill exactly one owner

Put one interviewer's name against each skill. That person prepares the test, runs it and writes the rating. Without that, interviewers ask about whatever needs no preparation. Easy topics often come up three or four times, and skills that need a prepared test get none.

Allow one deliberate overlap: a blind second rating on the heaviest skill, made without seeing the first and written into the plan with its reason. Anything else an interviewer wonders about goes in their debrief notes.

ExampleWhat an audit of one interview loop foundAn illustrative example written for this guide. The company and people are made up.

Role: senior implementation consultant at a warehouse software company. Four panel interviews, 210 minutes per candidate, no skills assigned.

Written communication, worth 20 of 100 points: asked about by all four interviewers, 85 minutes in total.

Reconciling two inventory files, worth 25 points: never tested, because nobody owned preparing the files.

Training a room of 20 warehouse staff, worth 15 points: never tested.

  • Easy topics pile up. Anyone can ask about writing unprepared, so all four did.
  • 40 points with no evidence. Both untested skills needed something built in advance.
  • The missing test decided it. The redesigned loop ran the file test, and the order flipped. The panel's favorite led 93.3% to 81.7% on the other five skills, but trailed 82.5% to 86.25% with the test included.

Budget the time next. Divide each skill's minutes by its weight. A 5-point skill booked for an hour, or a 25-point skill with no minutes, means the schedule and the weights disagree.

The same loop with one owner per skill (illustrative)

StageSkill it ownsWeightMinutes
Writing sampleWrites a status note a VP can use unedited2020 to grade
Hiring managerHas owned two customer go-lives end to end2535
Work sampleReconciles two inventory files; names an integration's cost3060
Training walkthroughTrains a room of 20 warehouse staff1530
Customer successDebugs a failed EDI message; blind second rating on go-lives1035

160 panel minutes instead of 210, and all 100 points have an owner.

Build the interview scorecard

The scorecard needs one row per skill: its weight, its owner, the rating, the level the answer reached and the evidence. Write the levels before the first interview. Google's re:Work site says the company often documents, with examples, what a poor, borderline, solid and outstanding answer would cover5 for each skill a question tests.

Four levels with no middle option make each interviewer come down on one side. Every rating also needs its evidence: what the candidate said or did, close to their own words. Treat a rating without evidence as missing, not low: it leaves that skill untested.

Levels for one skill: reconciling two inventory files (illustrative)

RatingWhat the candidate did
4Found the planted error, explained the gap and traced it to its cause
3Found the error and explained the gap, but not the cause
2Found it late, or couldn't explain it without help
1Didn't find the error in the time allowed

Run every interview the same way

Ask every candidate the same questions in the same order. Iris Bohnet, a behavioral economist at Harvard Kennedy School, advises scoring each answer right after it's given6, since we're more likely to remember vivid and recent answers. She also suggests comparing all candidates' answers to one question before moving on to the next.

Interviewers rate alone and submit their scorecards before the debrief. In the meeting, read the weighted totals once, then spend the time on disagreements and on ratings with thin evidence. A hiring debrief tool can pull the real disagreements and unsupported verdicts out of a panel's scorecards.

Keep the plan and every scorecard. In the US, an EEOC rule requires covered employers to keep hiring records for one year7 from when they are made or from the decision, whichever is later. A discrimination charge extends that until the case is closed.

When to involve an employment lawyer

Get advice before adding any test that every applicant must pass, and whenever a candidate disputes a decision. What employers may ask also varies by state. This guide is general information, not legal advice.

Before you book the first candidate

  • Every skill traces to a requirement of the role
  • The weights add up to 100 and are dated
  • Each skill has one owner, plus at most one planned second rating
  • Every work sample or written task is built and tested
  • Each skill has written levels for every rating
  • Interviewers know to submit scorecards before the debrief

The template on this page lays out that whole plan, from the assignment sheet to the debrief format. Open it in River, and River starts by measuring what your current interviews already cover.

How to use this template

Use the files as they are, or open them in River with Edit with AI. River asks for the role's requirements, what each interviewer asks today and how many candidates reached the panel. It measures which skills your current interviews test and which they miss, then helps you give each skill a weight and one owner.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Get the five Word documents and three CSV sheets free, or open the template in River to plan your interviews with AI.

  2. Measure the loop you run now

    Send the requirements and what each interviewer asks today. River shows which skills get tested repeatedly and which never do.

  3. Set weights and owners

    Give every skill a weight and one interviewer, then write the stage guides, panel brief and scorecard from that sheet.

  4. Run the loop and decide

    Collect every scorecard before the debrief, talk through the disagreements, then record the decision in the offer recommendation.

What's in the template

Forty weight points nobody tested, and the hire it would have costThe Competency to Interviewer Assignment, the Scorecard it feeds, and the Loop Feedback Log.
Interview Process and Scorecard Template
RiverAssignment

Competency to Interviewer Assignment

Illustrative for a fictional warehouse software company, Marloe Logistics. Senior Implementation Consultant, 21 weeks open. Weights fixed 4 February.

CompetencyRowWtReads
audited
Mins
audited
Min per
weight pt
Owner nowMins
now
C1 Owns two go-lives end to endMH 325362.52.50Ferreira35
C2 Reconciles two extracts unaidedMH 425000.00Tan50
C3 Writes a VP-readable status noteMH 820485.04.25Graded sample0
C4 Trains twenty warehouse staffMH 1115000.00Haddad30
C5 Debugs an EDI 940 or 945 failureNH 510242.54.25Berg20
C6 Names an integration's real costNH 125120.04.00Tan10
Totals10010210.0all owned160
Settled by a document, no loop minutes: MH 7 travel figure, MH 9 named prior sector.

Forty of the 100 weight points had no read at all, and both belong to competencies whose test has to be prepared in advance. C3 took 40.5 percent of the loop for 20 points. Across the loop, 126.7 of 210 minutes went to ground somebody else had already covered, which over nine panel candidates is 19.0 of 31.5 interviewer-hours.

RiverScorecard

Scorecard

Anchored four-point scale. 4 means they did it, named the specifics, and named what went wrong. Every rating carries the evidence that produced it.

CompetencyWtAdelekeQuinteroHalloran
C1 Owns two go-lives end to end25433
C2 Reconciles two extracts unaided25243
C3 Writes a VP-readable status note20433
C4 Trains twenty warehouse staff15342
C5 Debugs an EDI 940 or 945 failure10433
C6 Names an integration's real cost5343
Weighted, all six100330 of 400
82.5%
345 of 400
86.25%
285 of 400
71.25%
The four the old loop could see6097.9%77.1%75.0%

C2 is the difference and it is worth 25 points. Quintero found the seeded unit-of-measure fault in 18 minutes and traced it to the conversion applied on receipt. Adeleke found it at minute 41 and could not explain the variance without prompting. On everything the old loop was capable of reading, Adeleke wins by 20.8 points.

RiverFeedback Log

Loop Feedback Log

One row per stage, so the loop can say which component produced which outcome rather than reconstructing it later.

StageCompetency ownedEnteredAdvancedRateRatings 4/3/2/1
Recruiter screenMH 7 and 9, by document642234.4%not rated
Writing sample, gradedC3221463.6%3/9/8/2
Hiring managerC114964.3%2/6/5/1
Technical work sampleC2 and C69555.6%1/4/3/1
Enablement walkthroughC49666.7%2/4/2/1
Customer successC5, plus the C1 second read9777.8%2/5/2/0
Offerall six weighted3133.3%not rated

Submission

Thirteen of fourteen scorecards arrived before the debrief. The fourteenth landed a day late and its rating moved from 3 to 2 in the room, which is the whole reason the pre-debrief chase exists. The narrowest component is the technical work sample at 55.6 percent, and it is the component the audited loop did not have.

  • How a Competency Earns a SlotThe four conditions a skill must meet to get interview time, including a weight and one owner.
  • Competency to Interviewer Assignment sheetEach skill's weight, owner, test and minutes, beside what your current interviews spend on it.
  • Interview Guides by StageOne guide per stage: the skills it owns, the minutes for each, and what strong and weak answers look like.
  • Panel BriefA one-page note for interviewers: who owns which skill, what not to ask, and when to submit.
  • Scorecard sheetOne row per candidate per skill: the rating, the level it met, the evidence and weighted points.
  • Loop Feedback Log sheetWhen each scorecard arrived against the debrief, and how many candidates each stage advanced.
  • Debrief FormatA 45-minute agenda: coverage first, then disagreements, the weighted totals and one of four recorded decisions.
  • Offer RecommendationA one-page record of the decision: the deciding skill, the gaps accepted, the pay position and when weights were fixed.

Common questions

What should an interview scorecard include?

One row per skill. Each row holds the skill's weight, the interviewer who owns it, a rating on a fixed scale, the written level the answer reached and the evidence behind it. Add the candidate's name, the stage and the date. With a weight on every row, the overall score adds itself up instead of being blended by feel.

How many interviews should a hiring process have?

Enough to give every skill one owner, and no more. In this template's example, four panel stages of 30 to 60 minutes and a graded writing sample cover all six skills of a senior role in 160 panel minutes. Interviewers who repeat ground someone else owns add hours without adding evidence.

What rating scale should an interview scorecard use?

A short scale with every level written out for each skill. This template uses four levels, from "did not demonstrate it" to "did it, named the specifics, and named what went wrong," so there's no middle score to hide in. Whatever scale you choose, write the levels before the first interview, not after.

Can two interviewers assess the same skill?

Yes, once and on purpose. Plan a second rating only for the heaviest skill, note the reason in the plan, and keep it blind so the second interviewer never sees the first rating. Everywhere else, a single owner per skill stops the loop from testing easy topics four times and hard ones never.

What should replace "culture fit" in an interview?

The behavior you actually mean. Rating levels for "culture fit" are nearly impossible to write, so each interviewer ends up using their own taste. Name what you're after, such as "disagrees openly, then commits to the decision." Then tie it to a requirement of the job and give it a weight and an owner like any other skill.

Is this interview process template free?

Yes. Download the five Word documents and three CSV sheets with no signup. They come filled in with a made-up example, a warehouse software company hiring an implementation consultant, so you can see how each file works before clearing it. Edit with AI opens the same template in a free River workspace.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace and starts with the interviews you already run. Send the role's requirements, each interviewer's usual questions or recent scorecards, and how many candidates reached the panel. River shows which skills get tested repeatedly and which never, then helps you set a weight and one owner for each.

Sources

  1. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. “Structured Interviews.” opm.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. Harvard Business Review. “In Hiring, Algorithms Beat Instinct.” hbr.org (opens in a new tab)

  3. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. “Work Samples and Simulations.” opm.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. “Is Cognitive Ability the Best Predictor of Job Performance? New Research Says It’s Time to Think Again.” siop.org (opens in a new tab)

  5. Google re:Work. “A guide to structured interviewing for better hiring practices.” rework.withgoogle.com (opens in a new tab)

  6. Harvard Business Review. “How to Take the Bias Out of Interviews.” hbr.org (opens in a new tab)

  7. eCFR. “29 CFR 1602.14 — Preservation of records made or kept.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River