River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Hiring Manager Intake Meeting Template

Intake questions, a one-page role agreement and sheets that test a role's level, budget and start date against your own time to fill.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 7 files: 4 documents, 3 spreadsheets

Hiring Manager Intake Meeting Template
  • How the Trade-off Is PricedDocument
  • Intake QuestionsDocument
  • Role AgreementDocument
  • Trade-off NoteDocument
  • Requirement PrioritySpreadsheet
  • Time to Fill by Level and Band PositionSpreadsheet
  • Timeline and Capacity CommitmentSpreadsheet
RiverHiring Manager Intake Meeting Template

The intake conversation nobody has in week one

Level, budget, date. Pick two

Where your own history says the search takes longer than the date allows, one of these three is happening whether or not anybody decided it.

A. Hold The Level And The Budget

Give up the date. Costs whatever a week of slippage costs, which is a figure the hiring manager has to supply. If nothing happens when the date moves, this option is free and there was never a trilemma.

B. Hold The Level And The Date

Pay above the band. Frequently the cheapest option in the first year, and almost always the first one rejected, because the delay it avoids is not in anybody's budget line while the salary is.

C. Hold The Date And The Budget

Lower the level. Cheapest over a long horizon and the most expensive in year one, because the extra weeks to independent delivery and the supervision they need are real and land on somebody already covering the empty seat.

There Is No Fourth

Widening the search, adding a sourcer, running two recruiters. All real things to try, all attempts to move the median, and none of them a way out: until the median actually moves, the plan still rests on the old one. So they belong in the capacity commitment, not in the choice.

Page 1 of 1224 words

How to run a hiring manager intake meeting

A hiring manager intake meeting is where a recruiter and a hiring manager agree on a role before it opens. A good one settles what the new hire must deliver, which requirements are essential, the level, the pay range, the start date and the interview plan. It ends with a one-page agreement both people sign, recording what gives if the level, budget and date can't all be met.

The questions are the easy part. The skill is testing the answers against each other, and against how long your own searches have taken.

Two women talking at a wooden conference table in a brick-walled office, one holding a tablet, with a notebook on the table
Hold it face to face, with your own hiring numbers on the table. Photo: Amy Hirschi on Unsplash

Bring your own time-to-fill numbers

Hold the meeting before the job is posted. The US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) tells federal managers and HR to discuss how they will assess and rank candidates well before any job opens1. Bring the manager's notes, your salary bands and your record of similar searches.

For that record, export every similar job filled in the last two years: level, band, accepted offer and days from opening to acceptance. Group them by level and by where the accepted offer landed in its band.

Days to fill by level and offer position (illustrative)

Level and offer positionJobsMedian days
Senior, at or below midpoint5118
Senior, above 75th percentile467
Mid, at or below midpoint660.5
Mid, above 75th percentile440

Use medians, since one slow search distorts an average, and show how many jobs sit behind each. Here, senior searches paying above the band's 75th percentile took a median 67 days, against 118 at or below the midpoint. That's a pattern, not proof that money buys speed, but start your plan from it.

No salary bands yet? Start with a market-based salary band template.

Start with the work, then the requirements

Begin with what this person will have delivered 90 days in, specifically enough that you'd both agree it happened. Then ask what isn't getting done while the seat is empty, and who covers it.

Take the requirements one at a time, recording each answer as given:

  • What will they do in week two that needs it?
  • Could we teach it in the first quarter?
  • How would we test it, rather than take their word for it?
  • What would we accept instead?

A requirement stays a must-have only with a specific week-two task and a test behind it. The rest become strong preferences or preferences, recorded without argument and never deleted.

In the US, the EEOC says a requirement or test that screens out a protected group must be job related, associated with the skills needed to perform the job successfully2. If an equally effective alternative screens out fewer people from that group, it says to use that instead.

Pick proven tests. A 2022 review led by Paul Sackett of the University of Minnesota ranked structured interviews, job knowledge tests and work samples among the best predictors of job performance3.

ExampleSorting stated must-havesAn illustrative example written for this guide

Must-have: SQL and warehouse modeling. Week two: writes the schema mapping for the first customer. Test: a live modeling exercise.

Strong preference: Leading a technical workstream. Coordination starts in week six.

Preference: Eight years of experience. No week-two task or test was named.

  • Routed, not argued. A must-have with no reason goes to whoever sets level requirements.

Put a price on the start date

Ask for a date, not a quarter. Then ask what happens if it slips by a month, and what a week of delay costs. Contractor cover, a slipped launch or a customer commitment can each be priced by the week.

If the honest answer is "nothing much," write that down. The date is then a preference, and waiting for the right person costs little. An urgent date with nothing behind it tends to slip quietly, without anyone deciding.

Last, ask how long the manager expects this person to stay in the seat. A higher salary is paid every year, while delay and training costs are paid once, so the answer can flip which option is cheapest. Don't assume forever: the US Bureau of Labor Statistics found private-sector employees had been with their current employer a median 3.9 years4 in January 2026.

Choose between level, budget and date

Set the manager's date beside your median for the level and offer they want. If the median comes first, there's no conflict. If not, one of three things will happen, by choice now or by default later:

  • Hold the level and budget, and accept a later start.
  • Hold the level and date, and pay above the budget.
  • Hold the date and budget, and hire at a lower level.

Widening the search or adding a sourcer may shorten your median, but plan on the old one until it moves. Price each option for one year and over the expected stay.

One senior engineering role, priced three ways (illustrative)

OptionWhat it costsFirst yearOver 3.1 years
Later start, senior at $132,00044 days of contractor cover at $8,400 a week$141,764$418,964
Higher offer, senior at $148,000$16,000 a year over budget, every year$120,427$431,227
Lower level, mid at $112,00012 more weeks before working independently, plus supervision$150,674$385,874

First year runs 12 months from the meeting: salary for days worked, plus one-off costs.

The higher offer is cheapest in year one and most expensive over the 3.1-year stay, and the lower level is the reverse. Here, the manager chose the later start: the long stay ruled out the higher offer, and a mid-level hire couldn't lead the project soon enough.

If you choose the higher offer, compare it with current staff pay using the job offer letter and pay equity check, and make sure the posted range covers it. New York State, for one, requires employers with four or more employees to post a range believed to be accurate at the time of posting5.

When to involve HR or a lawyer

Pay range rules vary by state and city, and requirements that screen out protected groups need a job-related reason. Check with HR or an employment lawyer before posting. This guide is general information, not legal advice.

Agree what each side commits to

A date missed because feedback took a week isn't a sourcing failure. OPM counts the availability of managers to engage in hiring1 among the challenges of federal hiring. Write down both sides' promises, each with an owner, like these:

  • Recruiter: first candidates within 8 business days, then 4 a week.
  • Recruiter: tell the manager the same week if your open roles rise above 6.
  • Manager: feedback within 2 business days, and 3 interview slots held each week.
  • Both: no new requirements without a new agreement, and a review if there's no offer by the median day.

End the intake meeting with a signature

Write the outcome on one page and sign it in the meeting, or the same day. Include the 90-day result, level and band, date and weekly cost, and expected stay. Add all three options with their numbers, the one you chose and what it gives up.

Keep the rejected options visible: when someone asks in month three why the search is slow, the answer is already agreed. Send a short note to everyone the choice affects, naming the cost and who approved it. Say where the cost lands: contractor cover booked outside salaries can make slow hiring look free.

Before you close the meeting

  • Every must-have has a week-two task and a test
  • The date has a weekly cost, or is marked a preference
  • The expected stay is written down
  • All three options are priced, and one is chosen
  • Both sides' commitments have owners and dates
  • There is a date to reopen the plan if no offer is out

Next, turn the agreed requirements into a posting with the job description and requirement register, and give each test to one interviewer using the interview process and scorecard template. To skip the arithmetic, choose Edit with AI: River builds the time-to-fill table and prices the options for you.

How to use this template

The files work on their own. Read How the Trade-off Is Priced first, then fill in Time to Fill by Level and Band Position from your closed jobs. Run the meeting from Intake Questions rather than sending it as a form. Most files carry a worked example for a made-up company, so replace its figures with yours.

Choose Edit with AI, and River first asks for two years of closed jobs, your salary bands and the role you're about to open. It builds your time-to-fill table and shows the gap between your median and the manager's date. Then it names the two answers the meeting must get: what a week of delay costs and how long the hire should stay. With those, it prices all three options and leaves the choice to you and the manager.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Download the four Word documents and three CSV sheets free with no signup, or open them in River with Edit with AI.

  2. Build your time-to-fill history

    Group two years of closed jobs by level and by where each accepted offer sat in its band.

  3. Run the meeting live

    Ask the Intake Questions in conversation, get the weekly cost of delay and the expected stay, then price all three options.

  4. Sign it and send the note

    Both people sign the Role Agreement with the chosen option, then the Trade-off Note goes to everyone affected.

What's in the template

Cheapest in year one, most expensive over threeOne requisition, three priced options, and the segmentation that makes the middle column possible.
Hiring Manager Intake Meeting Template
RiverYour Own History

Time to Fill by Level and Band Position

Illustrative for a fictional analytics firm, Larkspur Analytics. Nineteen requisitions closed in the engineering family over two years. Medians, not means, and every day count listed rather than summarised.

LevelBand position of the accepted offernDays to fill, eachMedianGroup size
seniorat or below midpoint596 / 108 / 118 / 141 / 187118ok
seniorabove the 75th percentile452 / 63 / 71 / 8867four only
midat or below midpoint641 / 52 / 58 / 63 / 74 / 8960.5ok
midabove the 75th percentile429 / 36 / 44 / 5140four only
Paying above the 75th percentile cut the senior median from 118 days to 67. Senior band 118,000 / 138,000 / 158,000, so the 75th percentile is 148,000. Mid band 96,000 / 110,000 / 124,000.

The second column is the whole mechanism. Every applicant tracking system reports time to fill by role or by department; almost none of them segments by where in the band the accepted offer landed, which is the one cut that turns money into weeks. Group sizes are printed beside the medians rather than hidden: a median of four observations is worth reporting and worth flagging in the same breath, and a page that showed 67 days without the n would be selling something.

RiverThe Three Options

The three options, priced

REQ-2091 Senior Data Engineer. Intake 2 March 2026, needed in seat by 15 May, which is 74 days. Budgeted offer 132,000. A week of slippage costs 8,400, being one contractor engineer-week on a migration with a contractual go-live. Onboarding data: seven weeks to independent delivery at senior, nineteen at mid.

OptionLevelOfferMedian
days
In seatvs the
date
Trade-off
cost
First
year
Year 2+
salary
Over
3.1 yrs
A. Hold level and budgetsenior132,00011828 Jun44 late52,800141,764132,000418,964
B. Hold level and datesenior148,000678 May7 early0120,427148,000431,227
C. Hold date and budgetmid112,00060.51 May14 early57,392150,674112,000385,874
Option A detail. 44 days late is 6.3 weeks x 8,400 = 52,800; salary 132,000 for 246 of 365 days = 88,964.
Option C detail. 12 extra ramp weeks at half output is 6 engineer-weeks x 8,400 = 50,400; plus 19 weeks x 4 hours of senior supervision at a loaded 92 = 6,992; salary 112,000 for 304 days = 93,282.
Crossovers. B beats A for 28 months (21,337 of advantage against 16,000 a year). B beats C for 22 months (30,247 against 36,000 a year).

Read the last two columns against each other. The order fully inverts: the option that breaks the budget is cheapest in year one, the option that lowers the level is cheapest across Larkspur's own median tenure of 3.1 years, and the two views disagree completely. Which is why the pack refuses to recommend an option and instead refuses to close an intake until somebody states the horizon. It is the question the whole conversation turns on and it appears on no intake template. Larkspur chose A, for a reason no arithmetic reaches: the migration cannot be led by somebody twelve weeks short of independent delivery, and the supervision would land on the one senior engineer already covering the empty seat.

RiverRequirement Priority

Requirement Priority

The trilemma assumes the level is real. Often it is not, and then option C stops being a concession. Ten rows as stated by the hiring manager, with what survived.

RequirementStatedRecordedWhat they do in week two that needs itTestReason
recorded
Production streaming pipelines at scalemustmustruns the migration cut-over unattendedbroken-pipeline take-homeyes
SQL and warehouse modellingmustmustwrites the schema mapping for tenant onelive modelling exerciseyes
Multi-tenant data isolationmustmustdesigns the tenant boundary, week threescenario walkthroughyes
Leading a technical workstreammuststrong prefcoordination starts week six, not twostructured behaviouralyes
Our specific orchestration toolmustpreferencenot used until week five, learnablenoneyes
Eight years of experiencemustpreferencenothing specific identifiednoneno
Analytics or SaaS industry backgroundmustpreferencenothing specific identifiednoneno
Seven stated must-haves, three survived. Three more rows at strong preference and preference are not shown. A must-have needs a specific week-two answer and something that could test it. Both, or it is recorded as a preference.

Under the federal Uniform Guidelines, content validity requires a job analysis of the important work behaviours and their relative importance (29 CFR 1607.14), and relative importance is what this column is. Where two procedures serve the same legitimate interest and are substantially equally valid, the one with the lesser adverse impact should be used (29 CFR 1607.3), which is a reason to prefer a requirement that predicts over one that filters. Nothing here says a requirement is lawful or job related in the sense any regulation means. The two rows with nothing in the reason column are recorded as having none, and routed.

  • How the Trade-off Is PricedThe three options, where the days come from, and a worked example in which the cheapest option flips.
  • Intake QuestionsQuestions for a 40-minute meeting, 25 in all, ending with the cost of delay, the expected stay and the choice.
  • Role AgreementOne page both people sign: the 90-day result, level and band, all three options, the choice and commitments.
  • Trade-off NoteHalf a page for everyone the choice affects: what was decided, what it costs and what was turned down.
  • Requirement Priority sheetEach requirement's week-two task, whether it can be taught, how to test it, a substitute and its agreed priority.
  • Time to Fill by Level and Band Position sheetClosed jobs grouped by level and offer position, with every day count, the median and the group size.
  • Timeline and Capacity Commitment sheetEach side's promises, such as feedback within two business days, with an owner, a due date and a consequence.

Common questions

What is a hiring manager intake meeting?

It's the kickoff conversation between a recruiter and a hiring manager before a job is posted. They settle what the role must achieve, which requirements truly matter, and the level, pay, start date and interview plan. Agreeing this first keeps the search from being redefined after weeks of sourcing.

What questions should you ask in an intake meeting?

Ask what the person must deliver by day 90, what each requirement is needed for and how you'd test it, and the level and planned offer. Then ask for the start date, what a week of delay costs and how long the hire should stay. End by asking which trade-off you're making if you can't have it all.

How long should an intake meeting take?

Plan on about 40 minutes for one role, which is what the template's questions are built around. Book it before the job is posted, and send your time-to-fill numbers ahead so the meeting is spent deciding, not reading. A new or unusually senior role may need a second short session.

Should I send intake questions to the hiring manager as a form?

No. A form collects answers nobody tests against each other, so a senior level, a tight budget and an early date can all survive on paper. Ask the questions live, record the answers as given, and price the trade-off in front of the hiring manager before anyone signs.

What if the hiring manager wants a senior hire, on budget and soon?

Put your median time to fill for that level and offer beside their date. If the median is shorter, there's no conflict. If it's longer, they must pick a later start, a higher offer or a lower level. Price each one over the first year and over the expected stay, then let them choose.

Is this hiring manager intake template free?

Yes. Download all seven files, four Word documents and three CSV sheets, with no signup. Most carry a worked example for a made-up analytics company, so you can see how each one works before replacing its figures. Edit with AI opens the same template in a free River workspace.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace. River asks for your closed jobs from the last two years, your salary bands and the role you're about to open. It builds the time-to-fill table, flags the gap to the manager's date and, once you supply the delay cost and expected stay, prices all three options. It never picks one for you.

Sources

  1. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. “Hiring Reform.” opm.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. “Employment Tests and Selection Procedures.” eeoc.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. “Is Cognitive Ability the Best Predictor of Job Performance? New Research Says It’s Time to Think Again.” siop.org (opens in a new tab)

  4. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Employee Tenure in 2026.” bls.gov (opens in a new tab)

  5. New York State Department of Labor. “Pay Transparency.” dol.ny.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River