River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Contract Review Checklist Template

A position register to review against, an issue log by clause number, a memo of every call and who made it, and a client cover note.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 9 files: 6 documents, 3 spreadsheets

Contract Review Checklist Template
  • Using a Position RegisterDocument
  • Position RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Escalation LadderDocument
  • Issue RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Review MemoDocument
  • Redline NoteDocument
  • Client Cover NoteDocument
  • What This Review Did Not CoverDocument
  • Supervision RecordSpreadsheet
RiverContract Review Checklist Template

Review Memo

Matter M-0000  ·  [contract, dated, as received]

Reviewer: [name]  ·  Supervising lawyer: [name]  ·  Register version applied: [dated register]

Summary

How many issues, how many met the register, how many needed a decision above the reviewer, how many depart in either direction. Then the one issue that would change the recommendation if it went the other way. No risk verdict here: the verdict is the client's.

Issue [#]  ·  Clause [number]

What the clause says. Quoted or closely paraphrased, with the clause number. Never characterized.

What the register says. The Position Register row, quoted, with who set it and on what date.

The call. Standard, fallback, escalate, departs, or not in register, and the reasoning in your own words.

Risk. High, medium or low, with the exposure named. A level attached to nothing is a mood.

Who decided. A named person and a date. Blank means the issue is open and the memo says so.

Departures from the register

Every issue outside the register, collected, with the row it departs from and the direction. This is the section the register's owner reads.

What this review did not cover

The documents not supplied, by name. The facts nobody could establish. The commercial judgment nobody in this review made. Mandatory, and never a general disclaimer.

Page 1 of 1214 words

How to review a contract

To review a contract, read the whole agreement, schedules and linked documents included, and measure each term against what your side will accept. A good review logs each issue against its clause number and makes a clear call on it: accept, push back or escalate. It ends by listing the decisions that belong to the signer. A contract review checklist finds the issues, and written positions settle them.

Some of the costliest problems sit between two clauses that each read fine alone, so read everything once before you mark anything.

Black-and-white close-up of a hand marking a densely printed document with a pen, the other hand resting on a dark table
Every change you mark should trace back to a logged issue. Photo: Shutter Speed on Unsplash

Gather the documents and your positions

Collect every document the contract brings in: schedules, order forms, statements of work, linked policies and any agreement it replaces. If a schedule is missing, ask for it and record the gap. Terms posted at a web address can change after you sign, so save a dated copy.

Then set three positions for each recurring clause type. Your standard is the term you'd sign as written, and your fallback is what you'll accept without asking anyone. Your walk-away is what you won't sign. Name who decides anything in between, and record who set each position.

A customer's positions for three clause types

Clause typeStandardFallbackWalk-away
Liability cap12 months of fees, higher for data breaches12 months of feesUnder 6 months of fees
IP indemnitySupplier covers IP claims, uncappedUnder a separate, higher capNone offered
Termination for convenienceCustomer exits on 60 days' noticeAfter month 12, for a stated feeNo exit in a multiyear term

Illustrative only. A supplier's positions run the other way.

US public companies must file their material contracts as exhibits1, so you can search EDGAR, the SEC's free database, to test your positions against real deals.

Read it end to end first

Begin with the definitions, since a defined term can narrow an obligation 10 pages later. Then find the parts people skip: precedence, notices, documents incorporated by reference and anything after the signature page.

The precedence clause decides which document wins when two disagree. One standard federal clause, FAR 52.215-8, ranks the contract's clauses above its exhibits and attachments2. Check where yours ranks documents you haven't seen: an attachment that outranks the agreement can rewrite settled terms.

The notice clause says how notices must be sent, to which address and for whose attention. If you ever need to end the deal or send a breach of contract notice, one sent another way may not count.

Work through a contract review checklist

On the second pass, go clause by clause and log each issue against the clause number the document prints. An issue is anything that creates an obligation, allocates a risk, sets a deadline, limits a remedy or grants a right. Skip boilerplate nobody would negotiate.

  • Liability cap: the amount, what it is measured on and every carve-out
  • Indemnities: who covers whom, for what, and whether the cap applies
  • Term and termination: how it ends, on what notice, and what renews automatically
  • Payment: due dates, late fees, price increases and any right to withhold
  • Intellectual property: who owns new work and what each side keeps
  • Confidentiality and data: what the other side may keep, use or share
  • Assignment: whether either side can transfer the contract
  • Governing law and disputes: whose law, which courts and any arbitration

Certain terms are required by law. Say a vendor will handle personal information for a business subject to the CCPA, California's privacy law. Its regulations require the contract to bar the vendor from selling or sharing it and name the specific business purpose3, among other terms. Without them, handing over the data may count as selling or sharing it.

For each issue, quote the clause, name the position it meets and rate the risk with its exposure: "High: the rest of the term at the monthly fee." A bare rating gives the reader nothing to weigh.

Read clauses together

Always check these pairs:

  • An exit right and its notice deadline
  • A liability cap and the carve-outs outside it
  • A cap formula and a figure the contract doesn't give, like monthly spend
  • Each side's notice period for stopping a renewal
  • The precedence clause and documents you haven't received
ExampleTwo clauses that cancel each other outAn illustrative example written for this guide

7.2 After the 36th month of the Initial Term, Customer may terminate this Agreement for convenience.

7.3 Customer must give notice under clause 7.2 no later than the end of the 31st month. Termination takes effect on the date in the notice, no more than 120 days after it is given.

The Initial Term began on March 1, 2026.

  • Together, the exit can't be used. Notice is due by September 30, 2028, so termination takes effect by January 28, 2029 at the latest. The right starts on March 1, 2029.
  • One fix. Move the notice deadline to the end of month 34. A notice given December 31, 2028 can then take effect March 1, 2029.

Log it as one issue naming both clauses, with the dates worked out.

Make a call on every issue

Five calls, and who makes each one

CallWhen it appliesWho decides
StandardMeets your standardThe reviewer
FallbackMisses the standard, meets the fallbackThe reviewer
EscalateBetween the fallback and the walk-awayThe person your positions name
DepartsPast the walk-away, or better than the standardA senior lawyer or the deal owner
No positionNo written position covers itA senior lawyer or the deal owner

Better-than-standard terms show what the other side will accept.

Every issue ends with a person's name and a date. "Reviewer" isn't a name, and an issue without one is still open, however settled it sounds.

Close each review with one log line: the contract, reviewer, supervisor, which positions applied and how the calls split. In a law firm, the log documents supervision. Washington's RPC 5.1 puts supervisory duties on partners, managers and supervising lawyers, and a comment to it names policies designed to ensure that inexperienced lawyers are properly supervised4.

After a few reviews, the log shows which positions aren't real. A fallback taken every time is your actual standard, and a contract type that escalates half its issues has no settled view.

Write it up for the person who signs

In the markup, tie each change to a logged issue, with the reason in the margin: "Our standard is a cap of 12 months of fees," not "Not acceptable." Don't restyle, or the real changes get lost. The memo records each issue, its call and who decided.

The note to the signer says what the contract commits them to, in plain words, with clause numbers in brackets. It lists their decisions, with the trade-off for each, and what the review didn't cover: missing documents, facts nobody could confirm and the commercial call itself.

That call belongs to the client. A comment to Washington's client-communication rule, RPC 1.4, speaks to negotiations. When there is time to explain a proposal, it says, a lawyer should review all important provisions with the client before proceeding to an agreement5.

Before you send the review

  • Every document the contract brings in is on file or listed as missing
  • Each issue quotes its clause and names the position it meets, or none
  • Linked clauses were read together, with the dates worked out
  • Every issue has a person's name and a date
  • The signer's note lists their decisions and what the review didn't cover

When to bring in a lawyer

If you aren't a lawyer, involve one before accepting uncapped liability, an indemnity outside the cap, a transfer of rights in your work or a foreign governing law. This guide is general information about US practice, not legal advice.

When the other side returns your markup, compare the rounds before you reply. Once it's signed, put its renewal and notice dates in a contract renewal tracker. For a faster first read, Edit with AI opens this template in River, which logs and calls each issue for you to decide.

How to use this template

Use the files as they are, or open them in River. Edit with AI asks for the contract and everything it comes with, plus any positions you already hold, in any form: a playbook, a marked-up precedent or a partner's email. If you have none, River lists the three clause types the contract puts most at issue and leaves the positions blank for you to set.

River then reads the whole contract, logs each issue in the Issue Register against its clause number and calls it against your positions. It reports the departures, the escalations, any finding that needs two clauses read together and each document the contract names that you didn't send. It leaves the Decided By column blank for a person to fill.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Get the six Word documents and three CSV sheets free, or open the template in River to work through it with AI.

  2. Load your positions

    Fill the Position Register from a playbook, precedents or a partner's emails, or start with three clause types the contract raises.

  3. Log and call each issue

    Read the whole contract, then record each issue against its clause number and call it against your positions.

  4. Decide, write up and close

    A named person decides each issue. Then draft the memo and client note, and close the review in the Supervision Record.

What's in the template

One inbound contract, called against a register, and the record it leavesThe Position Register, the Issue Register, the Review Memo and the Supervision Record.
Contract Review Checklist Template
RiverPosition Register

Position Register

Illustrative rows for a fictional six-partner firm reviewing colocation paper.

Clause typeStandardFallbackEscalate toSet bySet on
Liability cap12 months of fees paid in the prior 12 monthsGreater of 12 months of fees or a stated dollar floorPartner on the matterP. Anand2026-01-12
IndemnityMutual, third-party IP and confidentiality, inside the capOne-way where we supply and the cap carves it outPartner on the matterP. Anand2026-01-12
Termination for convenienceEither party on 60 days written noticeCustomer only after month 12 with a stated feePartner on the matterP. Anand2026-01-12
Precedence between documentsunsetunsetunsetunset

The fallback is what you sign without asking. The escalate column is what stops everything reaching a partner, and a column naming the same person on every row means the ladder has not been decided yet.

An unset row is not a position. Every issue landing on the fourth row comes back as not in register, which is a finding rather than a gap for the run to fill.

RiverIssue Register

Issue Register

Six issues, one inbound master services agreement, nothing decided yet.

#ClauseWhat it saysCallRiskDecided by
19.1Cap is the greater of 12 months of fees or a stated dollar floorFallbackMediumopen
27(b)Exit arises after month 36; notice due end of month 31, effective up to 120 days laterDepartsHighopen
39Four carve-outs sit outside the cap, one of them the indemnityEscalateHighopen
439Precedence order is Schedule, then Service Order, then this agreementNot in registerMediumopen
514.2Consent to assignment required, not to be unreasonably withheldStandardLowR. Idris
612.1Governing law and venue in the counterparty's jurisdictionFallbackLowR. Idris

Row 2 came from two clauses, not one. Each is defensible alone. Read together, the window for serving notice shuts before the right it serves comes into existence.

Row 4 is the register's gap, not the contract's. No recorded position covers precedence, and clause 39 ranks four schedules nobody supplied above the document that was reviewed.

Four issues open. This review cannot close.

RiverReview Memo

Review Memo  ·  Issue 2

One issue section, written out. Five elements, every time.

What the clause says. Clause 7(b): the customer may terminate for convenience after the thirty-sixth month of the initial term, on written notice served no later than the end of the thirty-first month, with an effective date up to 120 days after that notice.

What the register says. Termination for convenience, standard: either party on 60 days written notice. Fallback: customer only, after month 12, with a stated early termination fee. Set by P. Anand on 2026-01-12.

The call. Departs. The two limbs do not overlap. Notice served on the last permitted day takes effect thirty-three days before the earliest date the right exists, so the clause grants an exit that cannot be exercised as drafted.

Risk. High. The exposure is the whole of the remaining term at the contracted monthly charge, with no exit and no stated remedy for the drafting conflict.

Who decided. Open. With the partner on the matter since 2026-03-04.

What this review did not cover

Four schedules incorporated by clause 39 and not supplied, which clause 39 ranks above this agreement. The monthly charge, which decides which limb of the clause 9.1 cap binds. Whether these terms are worth this deal, which is the client's call.

RiverSupervision Record

Supervision Record

One row per closed review. The counts are the only thing here that reads across matters.

MatterContract typeReviewerSupervisingIssuesEsc.RateClosed
M-2041Master services agreementR. IdrisP. Anand6117%No
M-2033Order formR. IdrisP. Anand400%Yes
M-2018Reseller agreementT. NagyP. Anand11436%Yes
M-1994Reseller agreementT. NagyP. Anand9556%Yes
M-1977Services agreementR. IdrisP. Anand500%Yes

Reseller agreements escalate 9 of their 20 issues across two matters. Every other closed review here escalates none. That is not a cautious reviewer; it is a contract type the firm has no settled view on, and it only shows up once several reviews have closed.

Register version is on every row. A review measured against the November register and recorded against the January one cannot be checked by anybody afterwards, which is the entire purpose of the sheet.

Six months later, the answer to why a clause was accepted comes off this row rather than out of somebody's memory.

  • Using a Position RegisterHow to load positions from whatever you hold, and why a row nobody signed off isn't a position.
  • Position Register sheetEach clause type's standard, fallback, escalation and walk-away, who set it and when, and how often it's departed from.
  • Escalation LadderWho decides each kind of call, from reviewer to partner, and how to spot a ladder that sends everything up.
  • Issue Register sheetOne row per issue: clause number, what it says, the position it meets, the call, the risk and who decided.
  • Review MemoThe file memo: five elements per issue, then departures, open items and what the review didn't cover.
  • Redline NoteEvery tracked change tied to the issue behind it, the position it restores and any fallback offered.
  • Client Cover NoteThe findings in business language, the decisions that belong to the client and the trade-off for each one.
  • What This Review Did Not CoverThe documents not supplied, the facts nobody could confirm and the judgments nobody made, each named.
  • Supervision Record sheetOne row per closed review: reviewer, supervising lawyer, the register version applied and how the calls split.

Common questions

What should a contract review checklist include?

Start with the clauses that move money or end the deal: the liability cap and its carve-outs, indemnities, termination and renewal, payment, intellectual property, data, assignment and governing law. Then add what reviewers tend to skip, such as definitions, the order of precedence, notices and any document brought in by reference.

What are standard, fallback and walk-away positions?

They are the three answers a contract playbook records for each clause type. The standard is the language you accept without discussion. The fallback is the concession a reviewer may make without approval. The walk-away is the line you won't cross. Anything between the fallback and the walk-away goes to a named person.

How do I review a contract without a playbook?

Start small. Pick the three terms that matter most in this deal and write down what you would accept and who decides beyond that. Treat each as provisional until someone senior approves it. Log any other issue as having no position, which is a question for a senior person rather than a gap to fill with a guess.

What are the red flags in a contract?

Uncapped liability, indemnities that sit outside the cap, automatic renewals with a short window to cancel, and exit rights only one side has. Watch too for terms pulled in from a web page the other side can change, and a precedence clause that ranks documents you haven't seen above the agreement itself.

Do I need a lawyer to review a contract?

Not for every contract. Bring one in when the stakes are real, such as uncapped liability, an indemnity outside the cap or a transfer of your intellectual property. The same goes for a foreign governing law or any clause you don't fully understand. A checklist and this template help you prepare and ask better questions, but neither is legal advice.

Is this contract review checklist template free?

Yes. Download the six Word documents and three CSV sheets with no signup. The sheets come filled with made-up examples, including a sample review of a services agreement, so you can see how each call works before clearing them. Edit with AI opens the same template in River.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace. River asks for the contract, its schedules and whatever positions you already hold, in any form. It logs each issue against its clause number, calls it against your positions and lists any documents you didn't send. Decided By stays blank until a person fills it in.

Sources

  1. eCFR. “17 CFR 229.601 — (Item 601) Exhibits.” ecfr.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. Acquisition.gov. “52.215-8 Order of Precedence-Uniform Contract Format.” acquisition.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. California Privacy Protection Agency. “CCPA Regulations (Effective January 1, 2026).” cppa.ca.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. Washington Courts. “RPC 5.1 Responsibilities of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers.” courts.wa.gov (opens in a new tab)

  5. Washington Courts. “RPC 1.4 Communication.” courts.wa.gov (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River