River
Y CombinatorBacked by Y Combinator

Free template

Legal Due Diligence Checklist Template

A request list, five tracking sheets and a report outline for legal due diligence on an acquisition, covering consents, lien searches, missing documents and issues.

Free download · No account needed

What you get

Pack of 10 files: 5 documents, 5 spreadsheets

Legal Due Diligence Checklist Template
  • Materiality StandardDocument
  • Reading a Data RoomDocument
  • Document RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Consent and Notice RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Search RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Issues ListSpreadsheet
  • Not Produced RegisterSpreadsheet
  • Diligence ReportDocument
  • Consent StrategyDocument
  • Request ListDocument

How to do legal due diligence for an acquisition

Legal due diligence is a buyer's review of a company's legal position before signing an acquisition. You request documents, from corporate records to litigation, and read them against how the deal is structured. Then you search public records under every name the company has used and report what affects price, terms or timing. A legal due diligence checklist tells you what to ask for. A good review also records which consents the deal needs and what the seller never produced.

Settle the deal structure before you read anything. The same clause can block an asset purchase and say nothing about a stock purchase.

A person in a dark suit holding a pen over a blank grid-ruled pad in a black leather folder, with thick bound volumes behind
Note the document and clause behind every finding, so anyone can check it. Photo: Amiel Gross on Unsplash

Set the structure and scope first

Write down the structure: a stock purchase, a merger (forward or reverse triangular) or an asset purchase, plus the signing, closing and outside dates. Structures change mid-deal, so mark each contract finding against each one.

Then agree with the deal team what counts as material: value and term thresholds, and clause types that matter at any size, such as exclusivity. Add anything the buyer cares about, however small, and name the topics others own, such as tax.

Use three materiality levels. High affects price, structure, timing or whether the buyer proceeds. Medium needs an indemnity, warranty or closing condition. Low is worth knowing but changes nothing.

Turn your legal due diligence checklist into a request list

Group the request list by topic and number every line so both sides can cite it. Name documents rather than topics: "every customer agreement above the threshold, with all schedules and amendments" gets documents, while "all material contracts" gets a folder.

What to request

TopicRequestCheck for
CorporateCharter and amendments, bylaws, stock ledger, minutesName changes, unapproved share issuances
Material contractsKey customer, supplier and license agreements, with schedulesConsent and change-of-control clauses, exclusivity
Real propertyLeases and deedsLandlord consent rights
DebtLoan and security agreements, guaranteesDefaults on a change of control, liens to release
EmploymentKey employment and contractor agreements, equity plansChange-of-control payments, misclassified contractors
Intellectual propertyRegistrations, licenses, assignments from founders and contractorsGaps in who owns the core technology
Litigation and complianceClaims, regulator letters, permitsMatters left off the disclosure schedules

On a startup target, rebuild the cap table from signed stock documents, not the founders' spreadsheet. Confirm everyone who built the core technology signed an IP assignment. Screen contractors who work like employees with a contractor vs employee classification check.

Index the data room before you read it

A data room holds what the seller chose to upload. Before reading anything, log every document with its folder, parties, date and the request line it answers. The room's shape is the first finding: unanswered request lines, thin folders, documents nobody asked for.

Then follow the references: every schedule, amendment and side letter a contract mentions is in the room or missing. If an amendment cites one you don't have, the text you reviewed may not be current, so mark the contract partial.

Track each missing item: when you asked, how often you've chased, and what depends on it. A refusal is a fact about the deal and belongs on the issues list, while silence goes back on the next call.

Read every contract against the deal structure

Consent clauses come in two kinds: an anti-assignment clause limits transferring the contract, and a change-of-control clause is triggered when a party's owners change. The structure decides which one the deal triggers.

In a stock purchase or a reverse triangular merger (a buyer subsidiary merges into the target, which survives), the target keeps its own contracts. In Meso Scale v. Roche (2013), Delaware's Court of Chancery held that the reverse triangular merger in that case was not an assignment "by operation of law or otherwise"1. The counterparty, it noted, could have negotiated for a change-of-control provision.

A forward merger, where the target merges into a buyer company and disappears, is harder. Courts in Delaware have held that the target's rights pass to the survivor by operation of law1, so a clause barring assignment "by operation of law" may apply.

Which structures trigger which clause

StructureAnti-assignment clauseChange-of-control clause
Stock purchaseGenerally notYes
Reverse triangular mergerGenerally notYes
Forward mergerCan be, with "operation of law" wordingDepends on the wording
Asset purchaseYes, each contract is assignedOnly if it covers a sale of assets

General positions under Delaware law. Wording and governing law decide each contract.

For each clause the deal triggers, record who must consent, how long they have and what a refusal costs: termination, a fee or loan repayment. A consent that can't be "unreasonably withheld" sets no deadline, so leave the time blank and expect it to run long.

Sort by what a refusal would cost, not by contract value. Then split the list three ways: needed at closing, can follow, and not triggered by this structure, each with a reason.

Add regulatory filings too. In the US, the FTC's 2026 update set the deal-size threshold for premerger filings at $133.9 million2, and a deal that files usually waits 30 days before closing3.

Search public records under every name

Lenders file UCC financing statements to record claims on a company's assets. Search them where the company is organized, not just where it operates. Under Delaware's Uniform Commercial Code, a corporation or LLC is located in the state under whose law it is organized4.

Use the exact registered name from the latest charter document. A filing under a slightly wrong name still counts if a search under the correct name, using the filing office's standard search logic5, would find it. So a clean trade-name search proves nothing. Record the string, office, date and result, never just "clean."

Search every former name too. After a name change, an old filing stays effective for assets acquired before the change or within four months after it5. A new-name search may never show it.

Federal tax lien notices against a corporation's personal property are filed in the state where its principal executive office is located6, which may not be its state of organization. Search court records where it does business for lawsuits and judgments.

Check the USPTO's assignment records too. A patent assignment is void against a later buyer or lender who paid without notice of it7, unless recorded within three months or before that later deal.

Write findings the deal team can act on

Log each issue with a document reference, a clause number, a proposed level and the exposure. Put what the document says and what follows for this deal in separate sentences.

ExampleOne issue, written upAn illustrative example written for this guide.

Issue 1. Loan agreement, clause 26.1.

What it says: a change of control is a mandatory prepayment event.

What follows: the $4.2 million loan is repayable at closing, so the funds flow must carry it unless the lender consents.

To resolve: a payoff letter or the lender's consent. Level: High, $4.2 million due at closing.

  • Fact apart from inference. The team can challenge the consequence without rereading the clause.
  • Exposure named. The amount at stake sits beside the level, so the team can argue it.

Put what could change the deal on page one, ordered by what it affects: price, structure, timing or whether to proceed. Then cover consents, searches, issues by topic, missing documents and what the review didn't cover.

Before you send the report

  • Every issue cites a document and a clause number
  • Each triggered consent is grouped, with a reason
  • Every search names the exact string, office and date
  • Each missing document says what depends on it
  • Topics outside the review are named, not implied

When to bring in a lawyer

If you aren't a lawyer, involve an M&A lawyer before you rely on any finding, and before anyone signs. This guide is general information about US practice, not legal advice.

For a single contract, use the contract review checklist. For a full room, Edit with AI opens this template in River, which indexes the documents, logs gaps and drafts the consent register for you to check.

How to use this template

Use the files as they are, or open them in River. With Edit with AI, River asks for three things: how the deal is structured, the data room in whatever shape you have it (an export, a folder tree or a document index), and the request list you sent the seller.

River indexes every document before reading any, logs request lines with nothing against them, then reads the contracts against your structure. It fills the consent register and issues list with clause references and reports what is blocking. Materiality levels stay proposals, and it gives no view on whether to proceed.

  1. Download it or open it in River

    Get the five Word documents and five CSV sheets free, or open the template in River to work through it with AI.

  2. Write down the structure and scope

    Fill in the Materiality Standard first: the deal structure, your thresholds and what the buyer cares about regardless of size.

  3. Index the room, then read it

    Log every document in the Document Register and every gap on the Not Produced Register, then fill the Consent and Notice Register and Issues List.

  4. Search, report and follow up

    Record each lien and litigation search in the Search Register, write the Diligence Report, and ask River to draft follow-up requests.

What's in the template

One data room, four registers, and the findings that were never in the roomThe Consent and Notice Register, the Search Register, the Not Produced Register and the Issues List.
Legal Due Diligence Checklist Template
RiverConsent Register

Consent and Notice Register

Six contracts on a fictional reverse triangular merger, sorted by what the counterparty gets if it refuses.

ContractTriggerConsent fromTimetableRemedy on refusalStatus
Facility agreementChange of controlLenderImmediateMandatory prepayment in fullFunds flow
Lease of Unit 4Change of control of tenantLandlordNot unreasonably withheld, no periodForfeitureAt completion
Master services agreementBoth limbsCounterpartyPrior written consentTermination plus six months of feesAt completion
Supply agreementChange of controlCounterparty board30 days pre-completionTermination on 60 daysAt completion
Distribution agreementAssignment onlyn/a on this structure——Not engaged
IP assignmentNone———Clear

The lender row is not a consent. It can decline and call the facility, so it belongs on the funds flow rather than on a legal chase list. Saying that is more useful than adding it to the queue.

The last two rows exist so nobody re-reads those contracts. A register where cleared contracts have no row cannot be told apart from one where they were never opened.

RiverSearch Register

Search Register

Six searches, one target. The word clean never appears without the string it was clean for.

Name string searchedWhy this stringOfficeResult
VANTAIL COMPOSITES INCRegistered name, as amended 2021DE SoS2 filings
FERNGATE COMPOSITES INCPrior registered name of the same entityDE SoS1 filing, never amended
VANTAILTrade name on invoices and the websiteDE SoS0, proves nothing
VANTAIL COMPOSITE INCNear miss, run deliberatelyDE SoS0
Vantail Composites IncRegistered name, litigationPACER1 live matter
VANTAIL COMPOSITES INCRegistered name, federal tax liensDE SoS (principal executive office in DE)0

Row two is the finding, and no current-name search returns it. A financing statement filed before the 2021 name change, never amended, against an entity whose disclosure schedule does not mention it.

Row three is why the register exists. Zero results under a trade name is a real result for a string nobody files under, and six months later it reads exactly like coverage unless the row says otherwise.

RiverNot Produced

Not Produced Register

Not an appendix. This is a findings artifact, because silence in a data room is a fact about the target.

ItemLineDays outChasedWhat turns on itSeller said
Schedule 3 to the distribution agreementB.4122Territory and exclusivity. Referenced nine times; the agreement is unreadable without itnothing
Amendment 1 to the supply agreementB.2122Whether the text reviewed is the operative textin the room, per seller
Seven senior employment agreementsE.1121Restrictive covenants for the people the buyer is paying forbeing collected
Board minutes 2024 and 2025A.6123Authorisation of the facility and the 2024 amendmentnothing
Insurance claims historyG.2121Whether the product liability exposure is priceddeclined

Two of these are blocking, not late. An agreement referenced nine times to a schedule nobody uploaded has not been reviewed, and an amendment pointing at an amendment nobody uploaded means the reviewed text may not be the operative text.

A refusal is different from silence. The declined line is a fact about the deal and goes to the Issues List. The quiet lines go back on the call.

RiverIssues List

Issues List

Every row traceable to a document reference and a clause, with the exposure named next to the level.

IssueSourceLevelEffect on the deal
Change of control is a mandatory prepayment event under the facilityDR-005 cl 26.1HighFunds flow at completion
Lease forfeits on change of control, landlord consent has no timetableDR-004 cl 8.3HighTimetable risk to completion
Financing statement under the pre-2021 name that no current search returnsSR-04HighEncumbrance absent from the disclosure schedule
Live litigation matter not on the disclosure scheduleSR-05HighDisclosure and indemnity scope
Resin patent assignment predates the inventor’s employment by three monthsDR-007, DR-006MediumChain of title to the core IP

The two highlighted rows came from searches, not from the room. Neither appears anywhere in the seller’s upload, and both are on the disclosure schedule’s silent side.

The last row came from two documents read together. Either document alone is unremarkable. The dates only conflict once the assignment and the employment file are on the same page.

  • Materiality StandardThe deal details, value and term thresholds, three materiality levels and what the review won't cover.
  • Reading a Data RoomHow to index the room before reading, follow every reference, and treat searches and gaps as findings.
  • Document Register sheetEvery document in the room: folder, parties, date, pages, who reviewed it and whether it's complete.
  • Consent and Notice Register sheetEach consent clause: its trigger, a column per deal structure, who consents, the notice period and the remedy.
  • Search Register sheetEach lien and litigation search: the exact name string, why it was chosen, the office, logic, date and result.
  • Issues List sheetEach issue with its source, materiality, effect on the deal, what would resolve it, owner and status.
  • Not Produced Register sheetEach requested item still missing: request line, dates, chases, days outstanding, what turns on it and the seller's reply.
  • Diligence ReportAn outline that puts what would change the deal first, then consents, searches, issues by topic and gaps.
  • Consent StrategyHow to sort consents by what a refusal costs and split them into three groups for the deal team.
  • Request ListA request list grouped into nine topics, A to I, with advice on wording lines and follow-ups.

Common questions

What should a legal due diligence checklist include?

A legal due diligence checklist should cover corporate records, material contracts, real property, debt and security, employment, intellectual property, insurance, litigation and compliance, asking for every schedule and amendment. It should also list the public searches to run for liens, tax liens and lawsuits under every name the company has used, and track what arrived.

What are common red flags in legal due diligence?

Common red flags include contracts that end or need consent on a change of control, and loans that become repayable at closing. Others are liens filed under a former company name, missing IP assignments from founders or contractors, and lawsuits left off the disclosure schedules. A seller's refusal to produce a requested document is a finding too.

What is the difference between legal and financial due diligence?

Legal due diligence checks rights and obligations: who owns the shares and intellectual property, what the contracts require, which consents the deal triggers and what claims are pending. Financial due diligence tests the numbers, such as earnings quality, working capital and debt. Tax review is usually a separate workstream run by tax specialists.

Does a stock purchase need consent under the target's contracts?

Usually not. Consent is needed only where a contract has a change-of-control clause, or an anti-assignment clause written to cover a change in ownership. Under Delaware law, buying a company's stock doesn't by itself assign its contracts, because the company still holds them. An asset purchase is different: each contract has to be assigned, so anti-assignment clauses apply.

Do I need a lawyer for legal due diligence?

For an acquisition, yes. A checklist and registers organize the work, but whether a clause is triggered, a lien is effective or an issue needs an indemnity depends on exact wording and governing law. Have a qualified M&A lawyer review the findings before they shape the purchase agreement. This template isn't legal advice.

Is this legal due diligence checklist template free?

Yes. Download the five Word documents and five CSV sheets with no signup. The registers come filled with a made-up acquisition, so you can see how each row works before you clear them. Edit with AI opens the same template in a free River workspace.

What does Edit with AI do?

It opens the template in a free River workspace. River asks for the deal structure, the data room and your request list. It indexes every document, logs requested items that never arrived, reads the contracts against the structure and fills the consent register and issues list. Materiality levels stay proposals for your team.

Sources

  1. Delaware Court of Chancery. “Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH.” courts.delaware.gov (opens in a new tab)

  2. FTC. “FTC Announces 2026 Update of Jurisdictional and Fee Thresholds for Premerger Notification Filings.” ftc.gov (opens in a new tab)

  3. FTC. “Premerger Notification and the Merger Review Process.” ftc.gov (opens in a new tab)

  4. Delaware Code. “Title 6, Article 9, Part 3. Perfection and Priority.” delcode.delaware.gov (opens in a new tab)

  5. Delaware Code. “Title 6, Article 9, Part 5. Filing.” delcode.delaware.gov (opens in a new tab)

  6. Cornell Law School. “26 U.S. Code § 6323 - Validity and priority against certain persons.” law.cornell.edu (opens in a new tab)

  7. Cornell Law School. “35 U.S. Code § 261 - Ownership; assignment.” law.cornell.edu (opens in a new tab)

Written by

Chandler Supple

Co-founder & CEO, River

Chandler has spent the last six years working in AI, building tools for millions of users and Fortune 100 companies. In 2025, he co-founded River to build a new kind of operating system for AI agents.

Reviewed by

Brian Joseff, Co-founder, River